Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Modeling of RAS complexes supports roles in cancer for less studied partners.

    BMC Biophys 2017 11;10(Suppl 1). Epub 2017 Aug 11.
    Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, Universsity of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
    Background: RAS protein interactions have predominantly been studied in the context of the RAF and PI3kinase oncogenic pathways. Structural modeling and X-ray crystallography have demonstrated that RAS isoforms bind to canonical downstream effector proteins in these pathways using the highly conserved switch I and II regions. Other non-canonical RAS protein interactions have been experimentally identified, however it is not clear whether these proteins also interact with RAS via the switch regions.

    Results: To address this question we constructed a RAS isoform-specific protein-protein interaction network and predicted 3D complexes involving RAS isoforms and interaction partners to identify the most probable interaction interfaces. The resulting models correctly captured the binding interfaces for well-studied effectors, and additionally implicated residues in the allosteric and hyper-variable regions of RAS proteins as the predominant binding site for non-canonical effectors. Several partners binding to this new interface (SRC, LGALS1, RABGEF1, CALM and RARRES3) have been implicated as important regulators of oncogenic RAS signaling. We further used these models to investigate competitive binding and multi-protein complexes compatible with RAS surface occupancy and the putative effects of somatic mutations on RAS protein interactions.

    Conclusions: We discuss our findings in the context of RAS localization to the plasma membrane versus within the cytoplasm and provide a list of RAS protein interactions with possible cancer-related consequences, which could help guide future therapeutic strategies to target RAS proteins.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    The Ras-Membrane Interface: Isoform-specific Differences in The Catalytic Domain.
    Mol Cancer Res 2015 Apr 7;13(4):595-603. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
    Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
    The small GTPase Ras is mutated in about 20% of human cancers, primarily at active site amino acid residues G12, G13, and Q61. Thus, structural biology research has focused on the active site, impairment of GTP hydrolysis by oncogenic mutants, and characterization of protein-protein interactions in the effector lobe half of the protein. The C-terminal hypervariable region has increasingly gained attention due to its importance in H-Ras, N-Ras, and K-Ras differences in membrane association. Read More
    Membrane-associated Ras dimers are isoform-specific: K-Ras dimers differ from H-Ras dimers.
    Biochem J 2016 06 7;473(12):1719-32. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
    Cancer and Inflammation Program, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Basic Science Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD 21702, U.S.A. Department of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
    Are the dimer structures of active Ras isoforms similar? This question is significant since Ras can activate its effectors as a monomer; however, as a dimer, it promotes Raf's activation and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) cell signalling. In the present study, we model possible catalytic domain dimer interfaces of membrane-anchored GTP-bound K-Ras4B and H-Ras, and compare their conformations. The active helical dimers formed by the allosteric lobe are isoform-specific: K-Ras4B-GTP favours the α3 and α4 interface; H-Ras-GTP favours α4 and α5. Read More
    Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes.
    J Mol Biol 2003 Jul;330(4):891-913
    Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
    Absolute binding free energy calculations and free energy decompositions are presented for the protein-protein complexes H-Ras/C-Raf1 and H-Ras/RalGDS. Ras is a central switch in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. In our study, we investigate the capability of the molecular mechanics (MM)-generalized Born surface area (GBSA) approach to estimate absolute binding free energies for the protein-protein complexes. Read More
    What makes Ras an efficient molecular switch: a computational, biophysical, and structural study of Ras-GDP interactions with mutants of Raf.
    J Mol Biol 2010 Jun 31;399(3):422-35. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
    Physikalische Chemie I, Fakultät für Chemie und Biochemie, Ruhr-Universität-Bochum, Universitätstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany.
    Ras is a small GTP-binding protein that is an essential molecular switch for a wide variety of signaling pathways including the control of cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. In the GTP-bound state, Ras can interact with its effectors, triggering various signaling cascades in the cell. In the GDP-bound state, Ras looses its ability to bind to known effectors. Read More