Reconstruction of Large Facial Defects via Excision of Skin Cancer Using Two or More Regional Flaps.

Authors:
Dong Min Lee
Dong Min Lee
Gachon Univeristy School of Medicine
Yong Chan Bae
Yong Chan Bae
Pusan National University
South Korea
Su Bong Nam
Su Bong Nam
Pusan National University School of Medicine
South Korea
Seong Hwan Bae
Seong Hwan Bae
Pusan National University School of Medicine
June Seok Choi
June Seok Choi
Pusan National University School of Medicine

Arch Plast Surg 2017 Jul 15;44(4):319-323. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Background: Free-flap surgery and skin grafting can be used to reconstruct large facial defects that may result after skin cancer removal by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, these two methods may produce low postsurgical patient satisfaction with aesthetics, and free-flap surgery may produce an undue burden for the majority of skin cancer patients, who are of advanced age. Hence, the authors examined outcomes of large facial defect reconstruction using multiple flaps.

Methods: Among patients undergoing MMS for skin cancer at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, we evaluated 7 patients (2 males, 5 females; average age, 73.14 years) treated for large facial defects from basal cell carcinoma. Based on operative and follow-up records, we investigated the number and type of flaps used, postsurgical complications, and patients' post-surgical satisfaction.

Results: Two and 3 types of flaps were used for 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Most frequently used were nasolabial flaps (7 times in 6 patients) and forehead flaps (once in each of 4 patients). The average follow-up period was 14 months, with no complications-including necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence-observed. Post-surgical satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of a maximum of 5 points.

Conclusions: Reconstruction using two or more flaps for large facial defects after skin cancer removal using MMS produced satisfactory outcomes while preventing aesthetic problems. Practitioners should consider using multiple flaps when choosing a reconstruction method for large facial defects following skin cancer removal.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.319DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533057PMC
July 2017
5 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin cancer
24
large facial
24
facial defects
20
cancer removal
12
flaps patients
8
free-flap surgery
8
defects skin
8
skin
7
flaps
7
patients
6
facial
6
cancer
6
defects
5
large
5
follow-up records
4
types flaps
4
based operative
4
carcinoma based
4
records investigated
4
operative follow-up
4

Similar Publications

The versatile naso-labial flaps in facial reconstruction.

J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2005 Dec;17(4):245-50

The Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

Background: Surgical excision of tumors from the face may create a defect that is difficult to restore. Skin grafts can only cover superficial defects and has a natural tendency to contract and may not take properly. Also, because of the colour mismatch, it is not cosmetically identical to the face. Read More

View Article
December 2005

Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units.

Plast Reconstr Surg 2007 Oct;120(5):1171-207; discussion 1208-16

Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Chicago, IL, USA.

Background: Facial reconstruction with only free microvascular flaps has rarely produced an aesthetic result. Menick stated, "Distant skin always appears as a mismatched patch within residual normal facial skin." In addition, earlier techniques using a single large nasal lining flap or bilateral nasal lining vaults incurred a high incidence of airway obstruction. Read More

View Article
October 2007

[Complete aesthetic reconstruction of nose and adjacent facial units with optimized use of free flaps, cartilaginous grafts and forehead flap combinations].

Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2009 Dec 7;54(6):497-522. Epub 2009 May 7.

2913, North Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 400, Chicago, Illinois 60657-6224, Etats-Unis.

Background: Facial reconstruction with only free microvascular flaps has rarely produced an aesthetic result. Menick : "Distant skin always appears as a mismatched patch within residual normal facial skin." In addition, earlier techniques using a single large nasal lining flap or bilateral nasal lining vaults incurred a high incidence of airway obstruction. Read More

View Article
December 2009

A Retrospective Review of Reconstructive Options and Outcomes of 202 Cases Large Facial Mohs Micrographic Surgical Defects, Based on the Aesthetic Unit Involved.

J Cutan Med Surg 2015 Nov-Dec;19(6):580-7. Epub 2015 May 18.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Background: For optimal treatment of facial defects following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), the aesthetic unit principles should be applied. Often multiple staged procedures and revisions are necessary.

Objective: To analyze the reconstructive options and outcomes for complex facial defects per aesthetic unit. Read More

View Article
December 2015