Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a
    Analysis of the Legal Effect of Settlement Agreements Prepared in Medical Litigation Following Plastic Surgery in Korea.
    Arch Plast Surg 2017 Jul 15;44(4):283-292. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    Background: Settlements between doctors and patients provide a solution to complicated disputes. However, some disputes may be renewed as a result of negligence by both parties. The purpose of this study was to review the legal issues that may potentially arise during the preparation of settlement agreements and to propose a list of requirements for ensuring the effectiveness of these settlement agreements.

    Methods: Data from 287 civil cases concerning aesthetic surgery that took place between 2000 and 2015 were collected from a court database in South Korea. Factors that influenced the effectiveness of settlement agreements were analyzed.

    Results: Among the 287 court precedents, there were 68 cases of covenant not to sue. Eighteen cases were dismissed because the settlement agreements were recognized as effective, and 50 cases were sent forward for judgment on their merits because the agreements were not recognized as effective. The types of surgery and types of complications were classified by frequency. We evaluated the geographical distribution of the precedents, the settlement timing, and the effectiveness and economic impact of the settlements. We found that there was no statistically significant relationship among these factors. Four major factors that made a settlement agreement legally effective were identified, and the data showed that fee-free reoperations were not considered by the court in determining the compensation amount.

    Conclusions: When preparing a settlement agreement, it is advisable to review the contents of the agreement rather than to take the preparation of a settlement agreement per se to be legally meaningful.

    Similar Publications

    Use of Nondisclosure Agreements in Medical Malpractice Settlements by a Large Academic Health Care System.
    JAMA Intern Med 2015 Jul;175(7):1130-5
    Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical School, Houston.
    Importance: Honesty and transparency are essential aspects of health care, including in physicians' and hospitals' responses to medical error. Biases and habits associated with medical malpractice litigation, however, may work at cross-purposes with compassion in clinical care and with efforts to improve patient safety.

    Objective: To determine the frequency of nondisclosure agreements in medical malpractice settlements and the extent to which the restrictions in these agreements seem incompatible with good patient care. Read More
    A Legal Analysis of the Precedents of Medical Disputes in the Cosmetic Surgery Field.
    Arch Plast Surg 2016 May 18;43(3):278-83. Epub 2016 May 18.
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    Background: Disputes regarding medical malpractice occur between practitioners and patients. As patients have become increasingly aware regarding medical care, an increase in the unexpected side effects of procedures has been observed, thereby leading to an increase in disputes regarding medical malpractice. In this study, we reviewed trends in precedents involving cosmetic surgery-related medical disputes, with the goal of helping to prevent unnecessary disputes in the future. Read More
    Informed Consent as a Litigation Strategy in the Field of Aesthetic Surgery: An Analysis Based on Court Precedents.
    Arch Plast Surg 2016 Sep 21;43(5):402-10. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    Background: In an increasing number of lawsuits doctors lose, despite providing preoperative patient education, because of failure to prove informed consent. We analyzed judicial precedents associated with insufficient informed consent to identify judicial factors and trends related to aesthetic surgery medical litigation.

    Methods: We collected data from civil trials between 1995 and 2015 that were related to aesthetic surgery and resulted in findings of insufficient informed consent. Read More
    Influencing factors leading to malpractice litigation in radical prostatectomy.
    J Urol 2014 Jun 11;191(6):1770-5. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
    Department of Urology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
    Purpose: The litigious nature of the medical-legal environment is a major concern for American physicians with an estimated cost of $10 billion. In this study we identify the causes of litigation in cases of radical prostatectomy as well as the factors that contribute to verdicts or settlements resulting in indemnity payments.

    Materials And Methods: Publicly available verdict reports were recorded using the Westlaw® legal database. Read More