Can surgical approach affect postoperative analgesic requirements following laparoscopic nephrectomy: Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal? A prospective clinical study.

Arch Esp Urol 2017 Jul;70(6):603-611

Department of Anesthesiology. Istanbul University. Istanbul Faculty of Medicine.

Objectives: We performed this prospective clinical study to compare the postoperative recovery profile of our patients after transperitoneal (Group T) and retroperitoneal (Group R) laparoscopic nephrectomy approaches. Our primary hypothesis was that epidural analgesic consumption in Group R would be higher at the end of the first postoperative day.

Methods: Forty-four patients scheduled for elective transperitoneal or retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies were enrolled. All patients in both groups received epidural catheter and general anesthesia induction. At the end of the operation, patients were given 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine through epidural catheters and extubated. Postoperatively, patients started to receive a continuous infusion of 0.1% bupivacaine and 1μg/ml fentanyl 5ml/h with patient-controlled boluses of an additional 4ml through a patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) device. They were prescribed IV tramadol 1mg/kg as a rescue analgesic VAS≥4). Total analgesic consumption from PCEA devices and VAS scores during the first 24 postoperative hours were recorded as well as number of patients who required analgesic rescue.

Results: Forty patients completed the study, 20 in each group. Total epidural analgesic consumption during the first 12 hours were significantly higher in Group R (p<0.05). Basal, postoperative 30 min, 2, 6 hours VASrest, VASmobilization and 12 h VASmobilization scores, and number of patients who required rescue analgesic at 0, 30 min in Group R were significantly higher than Group T (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy was found to be more painful and patients in this group required more epidural and analgesic rescue during the first 12 postoperative hours. (NCT02622893).
July 2017
6 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

analgesic consumption
epidural analgesic
laparoscopic nephrectomy
clinical study
prospective clinical
general anesthesia
anesthesia induction
operation patients
bupivacaine epidural
scores postoperative
epidural catheters
025% bupivacaine
patients 025%
induction operation
hours recorded
postoperative hours

Similar Publications

Comparison of ropivacaine with and without fentanyl vs bupivacaine with fentanyl for postoperative epidural analgesia in bilateral total knee replacement surgery.

J Clin Anesth 2017 Feb 22;37:7-13. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain, and Perioperative Medicine, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi 110060, India.

Study Objectives: Pain after total knee replacement (TKR) interferes with early rehabilitation. Although the use of epidural bupivacaine in post-TKR patients is associated with effective analgesia, the associated motor blockade effect delays functional recovery. We compared analgesic efficacy and side effects of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with plain ropivacaine 0. Read More

View Article
February 2017

Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy.

Urology 2014 Aug 26;84(2):335-9. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Department of Urology, King George Medical University (also, Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical University), Lucknow, India.

Objective: To compare the results of transperitoneal laparoscopic vs retroperitoneoscopic simple nephrectomy for benign renal diseases in a prospective randomized design.

Methods: In this study between January 2009 and August 2013, 31 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy and 31 retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy after randomization. The 2 groups were compared for the visual pain score on the first and second postoperative days as the primary end point of the study. Read More

View Article
August 2014

The effectiveness of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine 0.165% with fentanyl 2.0 miroc g/ml or levobupivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2.0 micro g/ml as a method of postoperative analgesia after major orthopaedic surgery.

Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2013 Feb;22(1):59-64

Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sg Buloh Campus, Sg Buloh, Selangor. Malaysia.

This prospective randomized single-blinded study was conducted to determine whether there were differences in consumption, demand dosing and postoperative analgesia quality between PCEA using ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Seventy patients with ASA classification I and II aged 18 to 80 years old scheduled for elective total knee replacement or total hip replacement were studied. All patients received CSE and then were randomly allocated to receive either ropivacaine 0. Read More

View Article
February 2013

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001 Apr;45(4):471-6

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

Background: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been found to be an effective method for pain relief during labour and after surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of bupivacaine-fentanyl PCEA and continuous epidural infusion with the same mixture for treatment of pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Fifty-four patients under spinal anaesthesia were allocated to two groups in this randomized, double-blind study: the PCEA group could demand a bolus of 0. Read More

View Article
April 2001