Overinterpretation is common in pathological diagnosis of appendix cancer during patient referral for oncologic care.

PLoS One 2017 7;12(6):e0179216. Epub 2017 Jun 7.

Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, United States of America.

Context: Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma are known to cause the majority of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP, i.e. mucinous ascites); however, recognition and proper classification of these neoplasms can be difficult despite established diagnostic criteria.

Objective: To determine the pathological diagnostic concordance for appendix neoplasia and related lesions during patient referral to an academic medical center specialized in treating patients with PMP.

Design: The anatomic pathology laboratory information system was searched to identify cases over a two-year period containing appendix specimens with mucinous neoplasia evaluated by an outside pathology group and by in-house slide review at a single large academic medical center during patient referral.

Results: 161 cases containing appendix specimens were identified over this period. Forty-six of 161 cases (28.6%) contained appendiceal primary neoplasia or lesions. Of these, the originating pathologist diagnosed 23 cases (50%) as adenocarcinoma and 23 cases (50%) as LAMN; however, the reference pathologist diagnosed 29 cases (63.0%) as LAMN, 13 cases (28.3%) as adenocarcinoma, and 4 cases (8.7%) as ruptured simple mucocele. Importantly, for cases in which the originating pathologist rendered a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, the reference pathologist rendered a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma (56.5%, 13 of 23), LAMN (39.1%, 9 of 23), or simple mucocele (4.3%, 1 of 23). The overall diagnostic concordance rate for these major classifications was 71.7% (33 of 46) with an unweighted observed kappa value of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.27-0.69), consistent with moderate interobserver agreement. All of the observed discordance (28.3%) for major classifications could be attributed to over-interpretation. In addition, the majority of LAMN cases (65.5%) had potential diagnostic deficiencies including over-interpretation as adenocarcinoma and lacking or discordant risk stratification (i.e. documentation of extra-appendiceal neoplastic epithelium).

Conclusions: Appendiceal mucinous lesions remain a difficult area for appropriate pathological classification with substantial discordance due to over-interpretation in this study. The findings highlight the critical need for recognition and application of diagnostic criteria regarding these tumors. Recently published consensus guidelines and a checklist provided herein may help facilitate improvement of diagnostic concordance and thereby reduce over-interpretation and potential overtreatment. Further studies are needed to determine the extent of this phenomenon and its potential clinical impact.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179216PLOS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5462425PMC
September 2017

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic concordance
12
cases
10
lamn cases
8
appendiceal mucinous
8
adenocarcinoma cases
8
cases 50%
8
appendix specimens
8
diagnosed cases
8
simple mucocele
8
diagnosis adenocarcinoma
8
rendered diagnosis
8
pathologist rendered
8
pathologist diagnosed
8
major classifications
8
reference pathologist
8
neoplasia lesions
8
patient referral
8
161 cases
8
medical center
8
academic medical
8

Similar Publications