Safety and Efficacy of Antibacterial Prophylaxis After Craniotomy: A Decision Model Analysis.

Authors:
Amal F Alotaibi
Amal F Alotaibi
MCPHS University
Boston | United States
Rania A Mekary
Rania A Mekary
MCPHS University
Boston | United States
Hasan A Zaidi
Hasan A Zaidi
Barrow Neurological Institute
United States
Timothy R Smith
Timothy R Smith
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston | United States
Ankur Pandya
Ankur Pandya
Center for Health Decision Science
Boston | United States

World Neurosurg 2017 Sep 31;105:906-912.e5. Epub 2017 May 31.

Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis has revolutionized the safety of neurosurgical procedures in the last century. Today, the clinician's drug of choice before surgery often is based on the antibiotic's resistance profile and drug-induced complications.

Methods: A decision tree model was developed to compare cefazolin (cephalosporin), vancomycin, or their combination on 90-day mortality postcraniotomy. We modeled the infection type (methicillin-sensitive, methicillin-resistant, or other organisms), antibiotic-related complications that could affect mortality (e.g., renal injury), and Clostridium difficile infections. Parameters' values were extracted from published sources. One-way sensitivity analysis was used to examine results' robustness to plausible variations in input parameter values.

Results: The expected value (EV) of 90-day survival was the greatest among patients on cefazolin (EV = 0.9145), followed by patients on vancomycin (EV = 0.8898), and patients on the combination (EV = 0.8886). Cefazolin was the preferred strategy in most one-way sensitivity analyses, except for a few cases in which other options could be preferred based on expected survival. Vancomycin was preferred if kidney injury risk was ≤0.056 conditional on vancomycin intake or ≥12% conditional on cefazolin intake. The combination was preferred if kidney injury conditional risk was ≤0.083 or that for kidney injury-mortality was ≤4.7%. Varying other risks (e.g., postsurgical-site infections (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, or other); Clostridium difficile infections' risks conditional on each antibiotic) did not change the preferred strategy.

Conclusions: According to this decision analysis, patients undergoing a craniotomy who had cefazolin as prophylaxis had a slightly greater expected survival compared with other strategies. These results were sensitive to changes in kidney injury development risk and kidney failure-associated death.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.126DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
September 2017
58 Reads
2.420 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kidney injury
12
staphylococcus aureus
8
expected survival
8
clostridium difficile
8
one-way sensitivity
8
preferred kidney
8
preferred
5
cefazolin
5
kidney
5
preferred strategy
4
cefazolin preferred
4
08886 cefazolin
4
patients combination
4
08898 patients
4
strategy one-way
4
combination ev =
4
ev = 08886
4
options preferred
4
survival vancomycin
4
vancomycin preferred
4

Similar Publications