Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers.

    Arch Plast Surg 2017 May 22;44(3):177-178. Epub 2017 May 22.
    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".
    Dan Med J 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479
    Gastroenterologisk Afdeling, Herlev Hospital, Herlev Ringvej 75, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
    Introduction: Research into the peer review process has previously been conducted in English-language journals. This study deals with a Danish general medical journal with a relatively small pool of both reviewers and readers. The aim of the study was to compare the quality of reviews produced by identifiable and anonymous reviewers, and further to characterize authors' and reviewers' attitudes towards different peer review systems. Read More
    Attitudes toward blinding of peer review and perceptions of efficacy within a small biomedical specialty.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014 Aug 8;89(5):940-6. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
    Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Purpose: Peer reviewers' knowledge of author identity may influence review content, quality, and recommendations. Therefore, the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics ("Red Journal") implemented double-blinded peer review in 2011. Given the relatively small size of the specialty and the high frequency of preliminary abstract presentations, we sought to evaluate attitudes, the efficacy of blinding, and the potential impact on the disposition of submissions. Read More
    The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Educ Prim Care 2009 Jan;20(1):34-40
    NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
    GP appraisal may, in future, have to include objective and verifiable elements. This condition could be achieved by developing peer review of core areas of clinical practice. The setting for the study was two regions of NHS Education for Scotland (NES) without existing peer review systems (Figure 1). Read More
    The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality.
    PLoS Med 2007 Jan;4(1):e40
    Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America.
    Background: Peer review is considered crucial to the selection and publication of quality science, but very little is known about the previous experiences and training that might identify high-quality peer reviewers. The reviewer selection processes of most journals, and thus the qualifications of their reviewers, are ill defined. More objective selection of peer reviewers might improve the journal peer review process and thus the quality of published science. Read More