Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Evaluation of a commercial automatic treatment planning system for prostate cancers.

    Med Dosim 2017 Autumn;42(3):203-209. Epub 2017 May 23.
    Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
    Recent developments in Radiation Oncology treatment planning have led to the development of software packages that facilitate automated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning. Such solutions include site-specific modules, plan library methods, and algorithm-based methods. In this study, the plan quality for prostate cancer generated by the Auto-Planning module of the Pinnacle radiation therapy treatment planning system (v9.10, Fitchburg, WI) is retrospectively evaluated. The Auto-Planning module of Pinnacle uses a progressive optimization algorithm. Twenty-three prostate cancer cases, which had previously been planned and treated without lymph node irradiation, were replanned using the Auto-Planning module. Dose distributions were statistically compared with those of manual planning by the paired t-test at 5% significance level. Auto-Planning was performed without any manual intervention. Planning target volume (PTV) dose and dose to rectum were comparable between Auto-Planning and manual planning. The former, however, significantly reduced the dose to the bladder and femurs. Regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation between volume overlap between bladder and PTV divided by the total bladder volume and resultant V70. The findings showed that manual planning typically exhibits a logistic way for dose constraint, whereas Auto-Planning shows a more linear tendency. By calculating the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to validate the statistical model, a reduction of interoperator variation in Auto-Planning was shown. We showed that, for prostate cancer, the Auto-Planning module provided plans that are better than or comparable with those of manual planning. By comparing our results with those previously reported for head and neck cancer treatment, we recommend the homogeneous plan quality generated by the Auto-Planning module, which exhibits less dependence on anatomic complexity.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with PubFacts.com)
    Source Status
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2017.03.004DOI ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    Automated volumetric modulated Arc therapy treatment planning for stage III lung cancer: how does it compare with intensity-modulated radio therapy?
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012 Sep;84(1):e69-76
    Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
    Purpose: To compare the quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans generated by an automated inverse planning system with that of dosimetrist-generated IMRT treatment plans for patients with stage III lung cancer.

    Methods And Materials: Two groups of 8 patients with stage III lung cancer were randomly selected. For group 1, the dosimetrists spent their best effort in designing IMRT plans to compete with the automated inverse planning system (mdaccAutoPlan); for group 2, the dosimetrists were not in competition and spent their regular effort. Read More
    A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
    Br J Radiol 2006 May;79(941):401-8
    Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK.
    This study focuses on understanding the impact of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery effects when applied to plans generated by commercial treatment-planning systems such as Pinnacle (ADAC Laboratories Inc.) and CadPlan/Helios (Varian Medical Systems). These commercial planning systems have had several version upgrades (with improvements in the optimization algorithm), but the IMRT delivery effects have not been incorporated into the optimization process. Read More
    SU-E-T-574: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Radiation: A Dosimetric Comparison between VMAT Techniques and Fixed-Beam IMRT.
    Med Phys 2012 Jun;39(6Part19):3837-3838
    UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
    Purpose: To compare prostate radiation planning using four VMAT techniques and IMRT on plan quality and dose delivery efficiency.

    Methods: The four VMAT techniques are: 1) Monaco VMAT (Version 2.03. Read More
    A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012 Jul;83(4):1169-78
    Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
    Purpose: We performed a comprehensive comparative study of the plan quality between volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer.

    Methods And Materials: Eleven patients with prostate cancer treated at our institution were randomly selected for this study. For each patient, a VMAT plan and a series of IMRT plans using an increasing number of beams (8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 beams) were examined. Read More