Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a
    [Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) ureteral reimplantation.]
    Arch Esp Urol 2017 May;70(4):480-486
    Servicio de Urología. Hospital NISA Pardo Aravaca. Madrid. España.
    Objective: To present in detail our surgical technique and to show our initial experience with ureteral reimplantation using the transumbilical LESS approach to treat patients with ureteral stenosis secondary to various diseases and surgical complications.

    Methods: We performed 7 ureteral reimplantations from February 2012, using the multichannel Richard- Wolf (KeyPort) platform placed transumbilical by a small 2-2,5 cm transversal incision. We always use a 3.5 mm minilaparoscopy accessory trocar in the right iliac fossa, that is crucial to perform the laparoscopic suturing safely for the patient and in an optimal time. The etiology of ureteral lesions was: 1 endometriosis, 1 symptomatic ureterocele not responding to endoscopic treatment, 1 ureteral lesion after ureteroscopy for lithiasis, 1 ureteral lesion after radical prostatectomy and 3 gynecologic iatrogenic lesions (1 laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, 2 radical hysterectomies with double anexectomy for cervix carcinoma). 5 ureteral reimplantations were left and 2 right sides. Before surgery, 5 patients had nephrostomy tubes inserted and the patient with endometriosis had a double J catheter. The patient with ureterocele did not require urinary diversion before the operation and endoscopic intraoperative catheterization was not feasible.

    Results: We present the operative and postoperative results of the patients undergoing surgery. They had a mean age of 49.3 [28-78] years. Mean intraoperative estimated blood loss was 132.1 [100-250] ml, with no transfusions required. Mean operative time was 127.4 [120-210] minutes, with no conversions to laparoscopic or open surgery required. Mean hospital stay was 2.1 [2-3] days and all patients had drainage removed at 48 hours. There were minor Clavien-Dindo complications in one patient presenting urinary tract infection 10 days after the operation. All patients had double J catheters that were removed with a mean of 34.3 [30-45] days. Mean time for bladder catheter removal was 7.8 [7-10] días. With a mean follow up of 32.6 [14-54] months no ureteral stenosis recurrence has been observed.

    Conclusions: LESS ureteral reimplantation, in our initial experience, shows a low complication rate, similar to current laparoscopic series, offering less postoperative pain and abdominal wall aggression with great cosmetic results that are perceived by patients very positively, in addition to rapid recovery and return to normal daily life.

    Similar Publications

    Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureteral reimplantation.
    Actas Urol Esp 2015 Apr 22;39(3):195-200. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
    Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Departamento Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España. Electronic address:
    Objective: To analyze the outcomes of umbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) ureteral reimplantation using a reusable single-port platform.

    Material And Method: The casuistic of LESS ureteral reimplantation in 5 patients is presented. The surgical technique using KeyPort system (reusable umbilical single-site platform) is described. Read More
    Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of the distal ureter: single institution experience in 16 patients.
    BJU Int 2013 May 10;111(5):773-83. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
    Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
    Unlabelled: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Open reconstructive surgery of the lower ureteric segment in adults often requires large incisions, as the basic prerequisite for such complex procedures is wide exposure. Published experience on minimally invasive techniques in this challenging surgical field, e.g. Read More
    Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: prospective evaluation of medium-term results and current developments.
    World J Urol 2010 Apr 4;28(2):221-6. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
    Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Am Gesundbrunnen 20, 74078 Heilbronn, Germany.
    Objective: Laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is a feasible method for treating ureteral pathology with good preliminary results in the literature. In this study, we review our medium-term results for laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and discuss current developments of this procedure.

    Materials And Methods: Twenty-four laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations were performed between August 2003 and December 2008 for ureteral strictures or ureteral injuries. Read More
    Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch: a multi-institutional, multinational evaluation.
    Urology 2008 Jul 2;72(1):47-50; discussion 50. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
    Center for Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
    Objectives: To report the collective experience of three multinational institutions with the use of robotics to evaluate and treat complex distal ureteral obstruction.

    Methods: A total of 12 patients from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Onze-Lieve-Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium; and Hospital Sultanah Aminah, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation between August 2004 and July 2006. The indications for ureteral reimplantation included ureteral stricture (n = 10) and ureterovaginal fistula (n = 2). Read More