Common Mistakes in the Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) in Turkey. A Retrospective Descriptive Multicenter Study.

Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2016;59(4):117-123

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beyhekim State Hospital of Konya, Konya, Turkey.

Background: Osteoporosis is a widespread metabolic bone disease representing a global public health problem currently affecting more than two hundred million people worldwide. The World Health Organization states that dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the best densitometric technique for assessing bone mineral density (BMD). DXA provides an accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, a good estimation of fracture risk, and is a useful tool for monitoring patients undergoing treatment. Common mistakes in BMD testing can be divided into four principal categories: 1) indication errors, 2) lack of quality control and calibration, 3) analysis and interpretation errors, and 4) inappropriate acquisition techniques. The aim of this retrospective multicenter descriptive study is to identify the common errors in the application of the DXA technique in Turkey.

Methods: All DXA scans performed during the observation period were included in the study if the measurements of both, the lumbar spine and proximal femur were recorded. Forearm measurement, total body measurements, and measurements performed on children were excluded. Each examination was surveyed by 30 consultants from 20 different centers each informed and trained in the principles of and the standards for DXA scanning before the study.

Results: A total of 3,212 DXA scan results from 20 different centers in 15 different Turkish cities were collected. The percentage of the discovered erroneous measurements varied from 10.5% to 65.5% in the lumbar spine and from 21.3% to 74.2% in the proximal femur. The overall error rate was found to be 31.8% (n = 1021) for the lumbar spine and 49.0% (n = 1576) for the proximal femur.

Conclusion: In Turkey, DXA measurements of BMD have been in use for over 20 years, and examination processes continue to improve. There is no educational standard for operator training, and a lack of knowledge can lead to significant errors in the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2017.38DOI Listing
June 2017
41 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbar spine
12
absorptiometry dxa
8
analysis interpretation
8
x-ray absorptiometry
8
proximal femur
8
dxa
8
common mistakes
8
dual-energy x-ray
8
measurements
5
femur recorded
4
recorded forearm
4
forearm measurement
4
measurement total
4
included study
4
total body
4
study measurements
4
measurements lumbar
4
spine proximal
4
performed children
4
consultants centers
4

Similar Publications