Detecting coached neuropsychological dysfunction: a simulation experiment regarding mild traumatic brain injury.

Clin Neuropsychol 2017 Nov 18;31(8):1412-1431. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

d Department of Psychology , VA Medical Center , Memphis , TN , USA.

Objective: Performance validity tests (PVTs) and symptom validity tests (SVTs) are often administered during neuropsychological evaluations. Examinees may be coached to avoid detection by measures of response validity. Relatively little research has evaluated whether graduated levels of coaching has differential effects upon PVT and SVT performance. Accordingly, the present experiment evaluated the effect of graduated levels of coaching upon the classification accuracy of commonly used PVTs and SVTs and the currently accepted criterion of failing two or more PVTs or SVTs.

Method: Participants simulated symptoms associated with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). One group was provided superficial information concerning cognitive, emotional, and physical symptoms. Another group was provided detailed information about such symptoms. A third group was provided detailed information about symptoms and guidance how to evade detection by PVTs. These groups were compared to an honest-responding group. Extending prior experiments, stand-alone and embedded PVT measures were administered in addition to SVTs.

Results: The three simulator groups were readily identified by PVTs and SVTs, but a meaningful minority of those provided test-taking strategies eluded detection. The Word Memory Test emerged as the most sensitive indicator of simulated mild TBI symptoms. PVTs achieved more sensitive detection of simulated head injury status than SVTs.

Conclusions: Individuals coached to modify test-taking performance were marginally more successful in eluding detection by PVTs and SVTs than those coached with respect to TBI symptoms only. When the criterion of failing two or more PVTs or SVTs was applied, only 5% eluded detection.

Download full-text PDF

Source Listing
November 2017

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pvts svts
group provided
provided detailed
brain injury
detailed symptoms
detection pvts
graduated levels
evaluated graduated
levels coaching
eluded detection
tbi symptoms
traumatic brain
validity tests
failing pvts
criterion failing
mild traumatic

Similar Publications

Medical Evaluation Board Involvement, Non-Credible Cognitive Testing, and Emotional Response Bias in Concussed Service Members.

Mil Med 2018 11;183(11-12):e546-e554

University of South Carolina-Aiken, 471 University Parkway, Aiken, SC.

Introduction: Military Service Members (SMs) with post-concussive symptoms are commonly referred for further evaluation and possible treatment to Department of Defense Traumatic Brain Injury Clinics where neuropsychological screening/evaluations are being conducted. Understudied to date, the base rates of noncredible task engagement/performance validity testing (PVT) during cognitive screening/evaluations in military settings appears to be high. The current study objectives are to: (1) examine the base rates of noncredible PVTs of SMs undergoing routine clinical or Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) related workups using multiple objective performance-based indicators; (2) determine whether involvement in MEB is associated with PVT or symptom exaggeration/symptom validity testing (SVT) results; (3) elucidate which psychiatric symptoms are associated with noncredible PVT performances; and (4) determine whether MEB participation moderates the relationship between psychological symptom exaggeration and whether or not SM goes on to demonstrate PVTs failures - or vice versa. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
November 2018

Strategies of successful and unsuccessful simulators coached to feign traumatic brain injury.

Clin Neuropsychol 2017 04 13;31(3):644-653. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

a Department of Psychology , Wayne State University , Detroit MI , USA.

Objective: The present study evaluated strategies used by healthy adults coached to simulate traumatic brain injury (TBI) during neuropsychological evaluation.

Method: Healthy adults (n = 58) were coached to simulate TBI while completing a test battery consisting of multiple performance validity tests (PVTs), neuropsychological tests, a self-report scale of functional independence, and a debriefing survey about strategies used to feign TBI.

Results: "Successful" simulators (n = 16) were classified as participants who failed 0 or 1 PVT and also scored as impaired on one or more neuropsychological index. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
April 2017

Comparisons of five performance validity indices in bona fide and simulated traumatic brain injury.

Clin Neuropsychol 2014 1;28(5):851-75. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

a Department of Psychology , Wayne State University , Detroit , MI 48202 , USA.

A number of performance validity tests (PVTs) are used to assess memory complaints associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, few studies examine the concordance and predictive accuracy of multiple PVTs, specifically in the context of combined models in known-group designs. The present study compared five widely used PVTs: the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM), Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT), Reliable Digit Span (RDS), Word Choice Test (WCT), and California Verbal Learning Test - Forced Choice (CVLT-FC). Participants were 51 adults with bona fide moderate to severe TBI and 58 demographically comparable healthy adults coached to simulate memory impairment. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
October 2014

Derivation of New Embedded Performance Validity Indicators for the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) Objects Subtest in Youth with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2019 Jun;34(4):531-538

Copeman Healthcare Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Background: Development of an embedded performance validity test (PVT) is desired for visual memory tests. The goal of this study was to derive an embedded PVT for the Child and Adolescent Memory Profile (ChAMP) Objects visual memory subtest in youth with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).

Methods: Children and adolescents (N = 91; mean age = 14. Read More

View Article and Full-Text PDF
June 2019