Neurogenetic analysis of childhood disintegrative disorder.

Mol Autism 2017 4;8:19. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut USA.

Background: Childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD) is a rare form of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) of unknown etiology. It is characterized by late-onset regression leading to significant intellectual disability (ID) and severe autism. Although there are phenotypic differences between CDD and other forms of ASD, it is unclear if there are neurobiological differences.

Methods: We pursued a multidisciplinary study of CDD ( = 17) and three comparison groups: low-functioning ASD ( = 12), high-functioning ASD ( = 50), and typically developing ( = 26) individuals. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES), copy number variant (CNV), and gene expression analyses of CDD and, on subsets of each cohort, non-sedated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while viewing socioemotional (faces) and non-socioemotional (houses) stimuli and eye tracking while viewing emotional faces.

Results: We observed potential differences between CDD and other forms of ASD. WES and CNV analyses identified one or more rare de novo, homozygous, and/or hemizygous (mother-to-son transmission on chrX) variants for most probands that were not shared by unaffected sibling controls. There were no clearly deleterious variants or highly recurrent candidate genes. Candidate genes that were found to be most conserved at variant position and most intolerant of variation, such as , , and , play a role or may be involved in transcription. Using the human BrainSpan transcriptome dataset, CDD candidate genes were found to be more highly expressed in non-neocortical regions than neocortical regions. This expression profile was similar to that of an independent cohort of ASD probands with regression. The non-neocortical regions overlapped with those identified by fMRI as abnormally hyperactive in response to viewing faces, such as the thalamus, cerebellum, caudate, and hippocampus. Eye-tracking analysis showed that, among individuals with ASD, subjects with CDD focused on eyes the most when shown pictures of faces.

Conclusions: Given that cohort sizes were limited by the rarity of CDD, and the challenges of conducting non-sedated fMRI and eye tracking in subjects with ASD and significant ID, this is an exploratory study designed to investigate the neurobiological features of CDD. In addition to reporting the first multimodal analysis of CDD, a combination of fMRI and eye-tracking analyses are being presented for the first time for low-functioning individuals with ASD. Our results suggest differences between CDD and other forms of ASD on the neurobiological as well as clinical level.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13229-017-0133-0DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5379515PMC
March 2018
37 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differences cdd
12
forms asd
12
candidate genes
12
cdd forms
12
cdd
11
asd
10
eye tracking
8
individuals asd
8
non-neocortical regions
8
childhood disintegrative
8
disintegrative disorder
8
tracking subjects
4
human brainspan
4
non-socioemotional houses
4
viewing socioemotional
4
eye-tracking analysis
4
subjects asd
4
socioemotional faces
4
fmri eye
4
faces non-socioemotional
4

Similar Publications