Prophylactic mesh placement for the PREvention of paraSTOmal hernias: The PRESTO systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One 2017 9;12(2):e0171548. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Background: Parastomal hernia (PH) is the most common complication after ostomy formation. Prophylactic mesh placement may be effective in reducing the rate of PH at the stoma site. The aims of this systematic review were to summarize the evidence with regard to the safety and effectiveness in comparison with the standard procedure without mesh placement and to identify important risk constellations.

Method: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library with no language or date restrictions. Randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs) were included. The main outcomes of interest were PH (primary outcome) rate and stoma-related complications (secondary outcomes) such as stenosis or fistula. Statistical analysis included meta-analyses of pooled data and subgroup analyses.

Results: Eleven trials (eight RCTs; three nRCTs) with a total of 755 patients were included. PH rate varied from 0% to 59% in the intervention and from 20% to 94% in the control group. RCTs showed a significant reduction of PH rate in the mesh group (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.58, p = 0.034), whereas included nRCTs did not. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complication rates. Subgroup analyses showed superiority of non-absorbable meshes and sublay mesh positioning in open surgery.

Conclusion: Prophylactic mesh placement is safe and reduces PH rate. A recommendation for prophylactic non-absorbable meshes in a sublay position can be made for patients undergoing open colorectal operations with end-ostomies. Further research endeavors should focus on patient-oriented outcomes, not only PH rate, with respect to tailored treatment in specific patient populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0171548PLOS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5300283PMC
August 2017
6 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mesh placement
16
prophylactic mesh
12
non-absorbable meshes
8
systematic review
8
meshes sublay
8
rate
6
mesh
5
patients included
4
included rate
4
rcts three
4
755 patients
4
nrcts total
4
three nrcts
4
total 755
4
varied 59%
4
rcts reduction
4
group rcts
4
reduction rate
4
rate mesh
4
mesh group
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Parastomal hernias
RK Pearl et al.
World journal of surgery 1989
Prevention of parastomal hernia by the placement of a mesh at the primary operation
F Helgstrand et al.
Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery 2008
Surgical treatment of colostomy complications
TG Allen-Mersh et al.
The British journal of surgery 1988
Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas
MT Cheung et al.
The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery 1995
The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments
A Hotouras et al.
Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2013
Surgical treatment of parastomal hernia complicating sigmoid colostomies
MT Cheung et al.
Diseases of the colon and rectum 2001
Parastomal hernia repair: a single center experience
DM Pastor et al.
JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2009
Surgery of recurrent parastomal hernia: direct repair or relocation?
W Riansuwan et al.
Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2010
Parastomal hernia repair
N Rieger et al.
Colorectal disease: the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 2004

Similar Publications