Evaluation of Hospitals' Disaster Preparedness Plans in the Holy City of Makkah (Mecca): A Cross-Sectional Observation Study.

Authors:
Loui K Alsulimani
Loui K Alsulimani
2King Abdulaziz University
Hattan M Bojan
Hattan M Bojan
4Ministry of Health
Taha M Masri
Taha M Masri
2King Abdulaziz University
Jennifer O Grimes
Jennifer O Grimes
Harvard University
Gregory R Ciottone
Gregory R Ciottone
University of Massachusetts
United States

Prehosp Disaster Med 2017 Feb 14;32(1):33-45. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

3Harvard Medical Faculty Physicians Fellowship in Disaster Medicine, an affiliated fellowship of the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative,Harvard University,Boston,Massachusetts,USA.

Background: Makkah (Mecca) is a holy city located in the western region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Each year, millions of pilgrims visit Makkah. These numbers impact both routine health care delivery and disaster response. This study aimed to evaluate hospitals' disaster plans in the city of Makkah.

Methods: Study investigators administered a questionnaire survey to 17 hospitals in the city of Makkah. Data on hospital characteristics and three key domains of disaster plans (general evaluation of disaster planning, structural feasibility of the hospitals, and health care worker knowledge and training) were collated and analyzed.

Results: A response rate of 82% (n=14) was attained. Ten (71%) of the hospitals were government hospitals, whereas four were private hospitals. Eleven (79%) hospitals had a capacity of less than 300 beds. Only nine (64%) hospitals reviewed their disaster plan within the preceding two years. Nine (64%) respondents were drilling for disasters at least twice per year. The majority of hospitals did not rely on a hazard vulnerability analysis (HVA) to develop their Emergency Operations Plan. Eleven (79%) hospitals had the Hospital Incident Command Systems (HICS) present in their plans. All hospitals described availability of some supplies required for the first 24 hours of a disaster response, such as: N95 masks, antidotes for nerve agents, and antiviral medications. Only five (36%) hospitals had a designated decontamination area. Nine (64%) hospitals reported ability to re-designate inpatient wards into an intensive care unit (ICU) format. Only seven (50%) respondents had a protocol for increasing availability of isolation rooms to prevent the spread of airborne infection. Ten (71%) hospitals had a designated disaster-training program for health care workers.

Conclusions: Makkah has experienced multiple disaster incidents over the last decade. The present research suggests that Makkah hospitals are insufficiently prepared for potential future disasters. This may represent a considerable threat to the health of both residents and visitors to Makkah. This study demonstrated that there is significant room for improvement in most aspects of hospital Emergency Operations Plans, in particular: reviewing the plan and increasing the frequency of multi-agency and multi-hospital drills. Preparedness for terrorism utilizing chemical, biologic, radiation, nuclear, explosion (CBRNE) and infectious diseases was found to be sub-optimal and should be assessed further. Al-Shareef AS , Alsulimani LK , Bojan HM , Masri TM , Grimes JO , Molloy MS , Ciottone GR . Evaluation of hospitals' disaster preparedness plans in the holy city of Makkah (Mecca): a cross-sectional observation study. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32 (1):33-45.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X16001229DOI Listing
February 2017
16 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hospitals
14
holy city
12
health care
12
city makkah
12
makkah mecca
12
hospitals' disaster
12
disaster
10
observation study
8
disaster response
8
hospitals designated
8
79% hospitals
8
emergency operations
8
disaster plans
8
71% hospitals
8
ten 71%
8
eleven 79%
8
cross-sectional observation
8
64% hospitals
8
preparedness plans
8
disaster preparedness
8

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Alamri et al.
2014
Hospital preparedness for emergency response: United States, 2008
Niska et al.
Natl Health Stat Report 2011

Li et al.
2008

Similar Publications