Outcome After Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Vulvar Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of the AGO-CaRE-1 Study.

Ann Surg Oncol 2017 May 28;24(5):1314-1321. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Purpose: Analyzing the large patient cohort of the multicenter AGO-CaRE-1 study, we compared isolated sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) with radical lymph node dissection (LND) of the groin in relation to recurrence rates and survival.

Methods: The AGO-CaRE-1 study retrospectively collected data on treatment patterns and follow-up of vulvar cancer patients [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ≥1B] treated at 29 gynecologic cancer centers between 1998 and 2008. This subgroup analysis evaluated the influence of SLND alone on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: In 487 (63.1%) of 772 included patients with tumors smaller than 4 cm, an LND was performed and no metastatic lymph nodes were detected (LN0). Another 69/772 (8.9%) women underwent SLND alone, showing a negative SLN (SLN0). Tumors in the LN0 group were larger and showed a deeper invasion (LN0 vs. SLN0 tumor diameter: 20.0 vs. 13.0 mm, p < 0.001; depth of invasion: 4.0 vs. 3.0 mm, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 33 months (0-156), no significant differences in relation to isolated groin recurrence rates (SLN0 3.0% vs. LN0 3.4%, p = 0.845) were detected. Similarly, univariate 3-year PFS analysis showed no significant differences between both groups (SLN0 82.7% vs. LN0 77.6%, p = 0.230). A multivariate Cox regression analysis, including tumor diameter, depth of invasion, age, grading, and lymphovascular space invasion was performed: PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.970, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.517-1.821] and OS (HR 0.695, 95% CI 0.261-1.849) did not differ significantly between both cohorts.

Conclusion: This subgroup analysis of the large AGO-CaRE-1 study showed similar results for groin LND and SLND alone with regard to recurrence rates and survival in node-negative patients with tumors <4 cm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5687-0DOI Listing
May 2017
56 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

node dissection
12
ago-care-1 study
12
lymph node
12
vulvar cancer
8
subgroup analysis
8
sentinel lymph
8
negative sln
4
gynecology obstetrics
4
federation gynecology
4
[international federation
4
sln sln0
4
patients tumors
4
obstetrics figo
4
slnd showing
4
stage ≥1b]
4
figo stage
4
showing negative
4
group larger
4
sln0 tumors
4
treatment patterns
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

C Levenback et al.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994

KN Gaarenstroom et al.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003

Van Zee der et al.
J Clin Oncol. 2008

A Wills et al.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013

MP Burger et al.
Gynecol Oncol. 1995

NC Grootenhuis te et al.
Gynecol Oncol. 2016

CF Levenback et al.
J Clin Oncol. 2012

JA Hullu de et al.
J Clin Oncol. 2000

M Hampl et al.
Gynecol Oncol. 2008

C Cicco de et al.
Br J Cancer. 2000

M Hassanzade et al.
Gynecol Oncol. 2013

Similar Publications