Unsolved challenges of clinical whole-exome sequencing: a systematic literature review of end-users' views.

BMC Med Genomics 2016 08 11;9(1):52. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Center of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, 740 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G1, Canada.

Background: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) consists in the capture, sequencing and analysis of all exons in the human genome. Originally developed in the research context, this technology is now increasingly used clinically to inform patient care. The implementation of WES into healthcare poses significant organizational, regulatory, and ethical hurdles, which are widely discussed in the literature.

Methods: In order to inform future policy decisions on the integration of WES into standard clinical practice, we performed a systematic literature review to identify the most important challenges directly reported by technology users.

Results: Out of 2094 articles, we selected and analyzed 147 which reported a total of 23 different challenges linked to the production, analysis, reporting and sharing of patients' WES data. Interpretation of variants of unknown significance, incidental findings, and the cost and reimbursement of WES-based tests were the most reported challenges across all articles.

Conclusions: WES is already used in the clinical setting, and may soon be considered the standard of care for specific medical conditions. Yet, technology users are calling for certain standards and guidelines to be published before this technology replaces more focused approaches such as gene panels sequencing. In addition, a number of infrastructural adjustments will have to be made for clinics to store, process and analyze the amounts of data produced by WES.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0213-6DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982236PMC
August 2016
1 Read

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

literature review
8
whole-exome sequencing
8
systematic literature
8
wes
5
reporting sharing
4
sharing patients'
4
analysis reporting
4
patients' wes
4
linked production
4
total challenges
4
challenges linked
4
reimbursement wes-based
4
production analysis
4
wes data
4
unknown significance
4
significance incidental
4
incidental findings
4
cost reimbursement
4
variants unknown
4
reported total
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

T Kaname et al.
J Hum Genet 2014

J Majewski et al.
J Med Genet 2011

SN Hart et al.
PLoS One 2013

RJ Lonigro et al.
Neoplasia 2011

D Liang et al.
J Mol Diagn 2014

PS Samarakoon et al.
BMC Genomics 2014

L Sastre et al.
Adv Genomics Genet 2014

S Jayadev et al.
Neurol Clin Pract 2011

DB Jackson et al.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011

SM Jamal et al.
Am J Med Genet A 2013

Similar Publications