The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:
Caroline Main
Caroline Main
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU)
Madhumita Dandapani
Madhumita Dandapani
University of Dundee
Mark Pritchard
Mark Pritchard
University Hospital of North Staffordshire
Simon P Stevens
Simon P Stevens
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU)
Roger E Taylor
Roger E Taylor
Cookridge Hospital
Keith Wheatley
Keith Wheatley
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit

Syst Rev 2016 07 27;5(1):124. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Background: The aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT).

Methods: Standard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. Twelve electronic databases have been searched, and further citation, hand searching and reference checking will be employed. Studies assessing the effects of PBT used either alone or as part of a multimodality treatment regimen in children with CNS tumours will be included. Relevant economic evaluations will also be identified. The outcomes are survival (overall, progression-free, event-free, disease-free), local and regional control rates, short- and long-term adverse events, functional status measures and quality of survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies for inclusion in the review. All interventional study designs will be eligible for inclusion in the review. However, initial scoping searches indicate the evidence base is likely to be limited to case series studies, with no studies of a higher quality being identified. Quality assessment will be undertaken using pre-specified criteria and tailored to study design if applicable. Studies will be combined using a narrative synthesis, with differences in results between studies highlighted and discussed in relation to the patient population, intervention and study quality. Where appropriate, if no studies of a comparative design are identified, outcomes will be compared against a range of estimates from the literature for similar populations and treatment regimens from the best available evidence from studies that include the use of advanced conventional photon therapy.

Discussion: The evidence base for the use of PBT in children with CNS tumours is likely to be relatively sparse, highly heterogeneous and potentially of a low quality with small sample sizes. Furthermore, selection and publication biases may limit the internal and external validity of studies. However, any tentative results from the review on potential treatment effects can be used to plan better quality research studies that are of a design appropriate for outcome comparison with conventional therapy.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42015029583.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0285-6DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4962509PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

Sign up to send a request to the authors directly.
July 2016
20 Reads
1 PubMed Central Citation(source)

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cns tumours
16
systematic review
12
children cns
12
studies
10
will
9
evidence base
8
inclusion review
8
identified outcomes
8
will employed
8
proton beam
8
review
7
quality
6
study
5
quality assessment
4
assessment will
4
identified quality
4
studies studies
4
limited case
4
base limited
4
case series
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Eur J Cancer
K Boman et al.
Eur J Cancer 2009
Article in Br J Cancer
WP Levin et al.
Br J Cancer 2005
Article in Acta Oncol
J Lundkvist et al.
Acta Oncol 2005
Article in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
CT Lee et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005
Article in Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
DC Weber et al.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2004
Article in Acta Oncol
B Glimelius et al.
Acta Oncol 1999
Article in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
EJ Hall et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006
Article in Acta Oncol
X Mu et al.
Acta Oncol 2005
Article in Semin Radiat Oncol
H Paganetti et al.
Semin Radiat Oncol 2013
Article in Phys Med Biol
B Clasie et al.
Phys Med Biol 2012

Similar Publications