Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Aortic Neck Anatomic Features and Predictors of Outcomes in Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Following vs Not Following Instructions for Use.

    J Am Coll Surg 2016 Apr 13;222(4):579-89. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
    Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Charleston, WV.
    Background: A significant number of patients undergo endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) outside the instructions for use (IFU). This study will examine various aortic neck features and their predictors of clinical outcomes.

    Study Design: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on EVAR patients. Neck features outside IFU were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were used to predict their effect as single features, or in combination, on outcomes.

    Results: Fifty-two percent of 526 patients had 1 or more features outside the IFU. The overall technical success rate was 99%, and perioperative complication rates were 7% and 12% for IFU vs outside IFU use, respectively (p = 0.04). Type I early endoleak and early intervention rates were 7% and 10% for IFU vs 18% and 24% for outside IFU (p = 0.0002 and p < 0.0001). At a mean follow-up of 30 months, freedom from late type I endoleak and late reintervention at 1, 2, and 3 years for IFU were 99.5%, 99.5%, and 98.4%, and 99.4%, 98%, and 96.8%; vs 98.9%, 98.1%, and 98.1%, and 97.5%, 96.2%, and 95.2% for outside IFU (p = 0.049 and 0.799), respectively. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for IFU were 97%, 93.5%, and 89.8%; vs 93.7%, 88.8%, and 86.3% for outside IFU (p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that a neck angle > 60 degrees had odds ratios for death, sac expansion, and early intervention of 6, 2.6, and 3.3, respectively; neck length < 10 mm had odds ratios of 2.8 for deaths, 3.4 for early intervention, 4.6 for late reintervention, and 4.3 for late type I endoleak.

    Conclusions: Patients with neck features outside IFU can be treated with EVAR; however, they have higher rates of early and late type I endoleak, early intervention, and late death.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    No major difference in outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair stent grafts placed outside of instructions for use.
    J Vasc Surg 2016 Jul 23;64(1):63-74.e2. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
    Division of Vascular Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
    Objective: Studies have shown that a sizable percentage of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is performed outside the instructions for use (IFU). We report our long-term outcomes after EVAR with respect to device-specific IFU.

    Methods: Computed tomography angiography data from a cohort of 566 patients meeting inclusion criteria who underwent elective EVAR between 2003 and 2014 were examined. Read More
    Outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR): an anatomic and device-specific analysis.
    J Vasc Surg 2008 Jul 28;48(1):19-28. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
    Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
    Objective: We performed a device-specific comparison of long-term outcomes following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) to determine the effect(s) of device type on early and late clinical outcomes. In addition, the impact of performing EVAR both within and outside of specific instructions for use (IFU) for each device was examined.

    Methods: Between January 8, 1999 and December 31, 2005, 565 patients underwent EVAR utilizing one of three commercially available stent graft devices. Read More
    Anatomic characteristics of abdominal aortic aneurysms presenting with delayed rupture after endovascular aneurysm repair.
    J Vasc Surg 2016 Dec 16;64(6):1629-1632. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
    The Institute for Vascular Health and Disease, Albany Medical College/Albany Medical Center Hospital, The Vascular Group, Albany, NY. Electronic address:
    Objective: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay of treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) requiring repair. Delayed rupture after EVAR represents a rare but potentially fatal complication. The purpose of this study was to review the frequency and characteristics of patients presenting with secondary rupture and to define the relationship between rupture after EVAR and initial compliance with instructions for use (IFU). Read More
    Results of endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms using the Endurant stent graft.
    J Vasc Surg 2014 May 14;59(5):1195-202. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
    Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
    Objective: Recent reports showed that the Endurant stent graft (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, Calif) is safe and effective for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, due to its relatively recent introduction, only short-term follow-up data are available. This study presents the 4-year results using this device. Read More