Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Cost-Utility Analysis of a Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program: The Teledialog Project.

    Telemed J E Health 2016 07 29;22(7):553-63. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
    7 Telehealth and Telerehabilitation, Laboratory of Assistive Technologies, SMI ®, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University , Aalborg, Denmark .
    Background: Cardiac rehabilitation can reduce mortality of patients with cardiovascular disease, but a frequently low participation rate in rehabilitation programs has been found globally. The objective of the Teledialog study was to assess the cost-utility (CU) of a cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) program. The aim of the intervention was to increase the patients' participation in the CTR program. At discharge, an individualized 3-month rehabilitation plan was formulated for each patient. At home, the patients measured their own blood pressure, pulse, weight, and steps taken for 3 months.

    Materials And Methods: The analysis was carried out together with a randomized controlled trial with 151 patients during 2012-2014. Costs of the intervention were estimated with a health sector perspective following international guidelines for CU. Quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

    Results: The rehabilitation activities were approximately the same in the two groups, but the number of contacts with the physiotherapist was higher among the intervention group. The mean total cost per patient was €1,700 higher in the intervention group. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gain was higher in the intervention group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The incremental CU ratio was more than €400,000 per QALY gained.

    Conclusions: Even though the rehabilitation activities increased, the program does not appear to be cost-effective. The intervention itself was not costly (less than €500), and increasing the number of patients may show reduced costs of the devices and make the CTR more cost-effective. Telerehabilitation can increase participation, but the intervention, in its current form, does not appear to be cost-effective.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    Effect of comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation on one-year cardiovascular rehospitalization rate, medical costs and quality of life: A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016 May 19;23(7):674-82. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
    Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium Faculty of Medicine & Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Belgium.
    Background: Notwithstanding the cardiovascular disease epidemic, current budgetary constraints do not allow for budget expansion of conventional cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Consequently, there is an increasing need for cost-effectiveness studies of alternative strategies such as telerehabilitation. The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation programme. Read More
    Effects of cardiac telerehabilitation in patients with coronary artery disease using a personalised patient-centred web application: protocol for the SmartCare-CAD randomised controlled trial.
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017 01 31;17(1):46. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
    Department of Cardiology, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven/Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
    Background: Cardiac rehabilitation has beneficial effects on morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease, but is vastly underutilised and short-term improvements are often not sustained. Telerehabilitation has the potential to overcome these barriers, but its superiority has not been convincingly demonstrated yet. This may be due to insufficient focus on behavioural change and development of patients' self-management skills. Read More
    Telerehabilitation after total knee replacement in Italy: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a mixed telerehabilitation-standard rehabilitation programme compared with usual care.
    BMJ Open 2016 05 17;6(5):e009964. Epub 2016 May 17.
    Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.
    Objectives: To assess cost-effectiveness and cost utility of telerehabilitation (TR) versus standard rehabilitation (SR) after total knee replacement (TKR).

    Design: Markov decision modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis based on patient-level and secondary data sources employing Italian National Health Service (NHS; Ita-NHS) and Society perspectives.

    Setting: Primary care units (PCUs) in Italy. Read More
    PATHway I: design and rationale for the investigation of the feasibility, clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a technology-enabled cardiac rehabilitation platform.
    BMJ Open 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e016781. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
    Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
    Introduction: Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) independently alters the clinical course of cardiovascular diseases resulting in a significant reduction in all-cause and cardiac mortality. However, only 15%-30% of all eligible patients participate in a phase 2 ambulatory programme. The uptake rate of community-based programmes following phase 2 CR and adherence to long-term exercise is extremely poor. Read More