The impact of a chlamydia education program on practice nurse's knowledge and attitudes in relation to chlamydia testing: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:
Rebecca Lorch
Rebecca Lorch
The Kirby Institute
Houston | United States
Rebecca Guy
Rebecca Guy
University of New South Wales
Australia
Meredith Temple-Smith
Meredith Temple-Smith
University of Melbourne
Professor
Melbourne, Victoria | Australia
Alaina Vaisey
Alaina Vaisey
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
Melbourne | United States
Anna Wood
Anna Wood
The George Institute for Global Health
Australia
Carolyn Murray
Carolyn Murray
University of South Australia
Australia
Chris Bourne
Chris Bourne
University of New South Wales
Australia

Sex Health 2016 02;13(1):73-80

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, Vic. 3010, Australia.

Unlabelled: Background We aimed to determine the impact of a chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) education program on the knowledge of and attitudes towards chlamydia testing of practice nurses (PNs).

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted at baseline and 6-12 months following recruitment with PNs in the Australian Chlamydia Control Effectiveness Pilot. Likert scales were analysed as continuous variables (scores), and t-tests were used to assess changes in mean scores between survey rounds and groups.

Results: Of the 72 PNs who completed both surveys, 42 received education. Epidemiology knowledge scores increased significantly between surveys in the education group (P<0.01), with change in knowledge being greater in the education group compared with the non-education group (P<0.01). Knowledge of recommended testing scenarios (P=0.01) and retesting following treatment (P<0.01) increased in the education group. Attitudes to testing scores improved over time in the education group (P=0.03), with PNs more likely to want increased involvement in chlamydia testing (P<0.01). Change in overall attitude scores towards testing between surveys was higher in the education group (P=0.05). Barriers to chlamydia testing scores also increased in the education group (P=0.03), with change in barriers greater in the education vs the non-education group (P=0.03).

Conclusion: The education program led to improved knowledge and attitudes to chlamydia, and could be made available to PNs working in general practice. Future analyses will determine if the education program plus other initiatives can increase testing rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH15134DOI Listing
February 2016
83 Reads
1.576 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knowledge attitudes
8
cross-sectional survey
8
education program
8
chlamydia testing
8
impact chlamydia
8
chlamydia
5
months recruitment
4
6-12 months
4
recruitment pns
4
completed surveys
4
australian chlamydia
4
pns australian
4
baseline 6-12
4
surveys received
4
nurses pnsmethods
4
education epidemiology
4
practice nurses
4
pnsmethods cross-sectional
4
survey conducted
4
conducted baseline
4

Similar Publications