Patient-reported outcomes in cancer cachexia clinical trials.

Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2015 Dec;9(4):325-32

Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Purpose Of Review: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures should be used when measuring concepts best known to the patient. To maximize the translation of findings into clinical practice, PRO measures that are most relevant for the patient group, should be used and careful reporting of the PRO results is required. The study reviews the use of PRO assessments in cancer cachexia randomized controlled trials.

Recent Findings: Most, but not all, recent cancer cachexia randomized controlled trials include PRO measures, and significant informative results have been found. PRO measures are rarely the primary endpoint. Most frequently, health -related quality of life and/or symptoms are assessed. However, instruments which are not cancer cachexia-specific are often used. Reporting of PRO data is generally poor.

Summary: Patient-centred care cannot be delivered without patient-centred outcome information and the assessment of the efficacy of interventions is partly determined by whether there is a measurable perceived patient benefit. To improve the chance of finding significant and useful results, investigators should use cancer cachexia-specific instruments and report their studies carefully.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000168DOI Listing
December 2015
2 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pro measures
16
cancer cachexia
12
reporting pro
8
randomized controlled
8
cachexia randomized
8
cancer cachexia-specific
8
pro
7
cancer
5
measures informative
4
include pro
4
informative pro
4
study reviews
4
perceived patient
4
primary endpoint
4
measurable perceived
4
rarely primary
4
trials include
4
measures rarely
4
patient benefit
4
reviews pro
4

Similar Publications