A systematic review of hospital accreditation: the challenges of measuring complex intervention effects.

Dr Paul Barach, BSc, MD, MPH
Dr Paul Barach, BSc, MD, MPH
Wayne State University School of Medicine
Clinical Professor
Anesthesia, critical care
Chicago, IL | United States

BMC Health Serv Res 2015 Jul 23;15:280. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Department of Medicine and Health, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Hamar, Norway.

Background: The increased international focus on improving patient outcomes, safety and quality of care has led stakeholders, policy makers and healthcare provider organizations to adopt standardized processes for evaluating healthcare organizations. Accreditation and certification have been proposed as interventions to support patient safety and high quality healthcare. Guidelines recommend accreditation but are cautious about the evidence, judged as inconclusive. The push for accreditation continues despite sparse evidence to support its efficiency or effectiveness.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) indexes and keyword searches in any language. Studies were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and AMSTAR framework. 915 abstracts were screened and 20 papers were reviewed in full in January 2013. Inclusion criteria included studies addressing the effect of hospital accreditation and certification using systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, observational studies with a control group, or interrupted time series. Outcomes included both clinical outcomes and process measures. An updated literature search in July 2014 identified no new studies.

Results: The literature review uncovered three systematic reviews and one randomized controlled trial. The lone study assessed the effects of accreditation on hospital outcomes and reported inconsistent results. Excluded studies were reviewed and their findings summarized.

Conclusion: Accreditation continues to grow internationally but due to scant evidence, no conclusions could be reached to support its effectiveness. Our review did not find evidence to support accreditation and certification of hospitals being linked to measurable changes in quality of care as measured by quality metrics and standards. Most studies did not report intervention context, implementation, or cost. This might reflect the challenges in assessing complex, heterogeneous interventions such as accreditation and certification. It is also may be magnified by the impact of how accreditation is managed and executed, and the varied financial and organizational healthcare constraints. The strategies hospitals should impelment to improve patient safety and organizational outcomes related to accreditation and certification components remains unclear.

Download full-text PDF

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0933-xDOI Listing
July 2015
40 Reads
10 Citations
1.660 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accreditation certification
quality care
randomized controlled
reviews randomized
hospital accreditation
patient safety
accreditation continues
systematic reviews
evidence support
clinical outcomes
included clinical
literature search
search july
july 2014
process measures
measures updated

Altmetric Statistics


(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Am J Manage Care
HN Viswanathan et al.
Am J Manage Care 2000
Article in Arch Oncol
B Jovanovic et al.
Arch Oncol 2005
Article in Int J Qual Health Care
C Shaw et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2010
Article in Int J Qual Health Care
CD Shaw et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2003
Article in Qual Saf Health Care
D Greenfield et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2009
Article in Int J Health Plann Manage
S Grepperud et al.
Int J Health Plann Manage 2015
Article in Int J Qual Health Care
D Greenfield et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2008

W Nicklin et al.
Article in Res J Med Sci
B Al-Awa et al.
Res J Med Sci 2011
Article in BMJ Qual Saf
R Hinchcliff et al.
BMJ Qual Saf 2012

GE Vist et al.

Similar Publications