Agreement between Myocardial Infarction Patients and Their Spouses on Reporting of Data on 82 Cardiovascular Risk Exposures.

PLoS One 2015 10;10(7):e0132601. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Background: The validity of exposure data collected from proxy respondents of myocardial infarction patients has scarcely been studied. We assessed the level of disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and their spouses with respect to the reporting of the patient´s cardiovascular risk exposures.

Methods: Within the frame of the Stockholm Heart Epidemiology Program (SHEEP), a case-control study of risk factors of myocardial infarction performed in Stockholm county 1992-1994, a subset of 327 first time myocardial infarction cases aged 45-70 who survived >28 days after the event and who co-habited with a spouse or common-law spouse (proxy) were identified between 1993-04-05 and 1993-12-31. Among these, 243 cases participated along with their respective proxy in the present study. Control individuals, matched to cases by age, sex and residential area were also included (n = 243). Data were collected using questionnaires. Using conditional logistic regression we calculated for each of 82 exposures the odds ratio based on information collected from 1) myocardial infarction cases and controls [odds ratio A] and 2) proxies and the same set of controls [odds ratio B]. Disagreement was measured by calculating the ratio between odds ratio B and odds ratio A with 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using resampling bootstrap.

Results: For the vast majority of the exposures considered including diet, smoking, education, work-related stress, and family history of CVD, there was no statistically significant disagreement between myocardial infarction patients and proxies (n = 243 pairs). However, leisure time physical inactivity (proxy bias = 1.59, 95% CI 1.05-3.57) was overestimated by spouses compared to myocardial infarction patients. A few other exposures including some sleep-related problems and work-related issues also showed disagreement.

Conclusions: Myocardial infarction patients and their spouses similarly reported data on a wide range of exposures including the majority of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors, leisure time physical inactivity being an exception.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0132601PLOS
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498787PMC
April 2016
14 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

myocardial infarction
36
infarction patients
24
cardiovascular risk
12
patients spouses
12
odds ratio
12
infarction
9
[odds ratio
8
risk factors
8
myocardial
8
controls [odds
8
data collected
8
disagreement myocardial
8
leisure time
8
time physical
8
physical inactivity
8
infarction cases
8
ratio odds
8
exposures including
8
patients
6
ratio
6

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Comparison of patient and proxy responses on risk factors for stroke
LG Capelle et al.
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 2011
Reliability of surrogate information on cigarette-smoking by type of informant
JK McLaughlin et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology 1987
Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS)
J Kottner et al.
International Journal of Nursing Studies 2011
Coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
JA Cohen et al.
Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960
A validation of information provided by household respondents in health surveys
PE Enterline et al.
American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health 1959

Similar Publications