Barrier agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015 Apr 30(4):CD000475. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pennine Acute NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.

Background: Pelvic adhesions can form as a result of inflammation, endometriosis or surgical trauma. During pelvic surgery, strategies to reduce pelvic adhesion formation include placing barrier agents such as oxidised regenerated cellulose, polytetrafluoroethylene or fibrin sheets between the pelvic structures.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of barrier agents used during pelvic surgery on rates of pain, live birth and postoperative adhesions in women of reproductive age.

Search Methods: We searched the following databases in February 2015: the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and trial registries. We handsearched relevant journals, conference proceedings and grey literature sources and we contacted pharmaceutical companies for information.

Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the use of barrier agents compared with other barrier agents, placebo or no treatment for the prevention of adhesions in women undergoing gynaecological surgery.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and risk of bias and extracted the data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed effect model. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methods.

Main Results: Eighteen RCTs (1262 women) were included. Six RCTs randomised women; the remainder randomised pelvic organs. Laparoscopy (eight RCTs) and laparotomy (10 RCTs) were the primary surgical techniques. Indications for surgery included myomectomy (six RCTs), ovarian surgery (five RCTs), pelvic adhesions (five RCTs), endometriosis (one RCT) and mixed (one RCT). The sole indication for surgery in three of the RCTs was infertility. Twelve RCTs reported commercial funding; the rest did not state their source of funding.No studies reported either of our primary outcomes of pelvic pain and live birth. Oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed) versus no treatment at laparoscopy or laparotomy (13 RCTs)At second-look laparoscopy oxidised regenerated cellulose at laparoscopy was associated with reduced incidence of de novo adhesions (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.83, three RCTs, 360 participants, I(2) = 75%, very low-quality evidence) and of re-formed adhesions (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.41, three RCTs, 100 participants, I(2) = 36%, low quality evidence).At second-look laparoscopy no evidence was found of any difference between the groups in the incidence of de novo adhesions after laparotomy (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.25, one RCT, 271 participants, I(2) = 41%, low-quality evidence). However, the incidence of re-formed adhesions was lower in the intervention group (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.55, six RCTs, 554 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) versus no treatment at gynaecological surgery (one RCT) The evidence suggested that at second-look laparoscopy expanded polytetrafluoroethylene was associated with a reduction in new adhesion formation (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.94, one RCT, 42 participants, low-quality evidence). Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) versus oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed) at gynaecological surgery (two RCTs)One RCT found no difference between the groups at second-look laparoscopy in the incidence of de novo adhesions (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.41, 38 participants, very low-quality evidence). A second RCT suggested that the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene group had a lower adhesion score (out of 11) (MD -3.79, 95% CI -5.12 to -2.46, 62 participants, very low-quality evidence) and a lower risk of re-formed adhesions (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.80, 23 participants, very low-quality evidence). This last finding was sensitive to choice of effect estimate and no longer suggested a difference between the groups when a risk ratio was calculated (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.01). Sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) versus no treatment at gynaecological surgery (one RCT)Sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose was associated with a lower adhesion score (out of 4) at second-look laparoscopy (MD 0.49, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.45, one RCT, 127 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Fibrin sheet versus no treatment at laparoscopic myomectomy (one RCT)There was no evidence of a difference between the groups in the incidence of de novo adhesions at second-look laparoscopy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.41, one RCT, 62 participants) or in adhesion score (out of 4) (MD 0.14, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.39, one RCT, 48 participants, low-quality evidence).Fourteen of the 18 RCTs reported adverse events. No events directly attributed to adhesion agents were reported.

Authors' Conclusions: We found no evidence on the effects of barrier agents used during pelvic surgery on either pain or fertility outcomes in women of reproductive age.Low quality evidence suggests that oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and sodium hyaluronate with carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm) may all be more effective than no treatment in reducing the incidence of adhesion formation following pelvic surgery. There is no conclusive evidence on the relative effectiveness of these interventions. There is no evidence to suggest that fibrin sheet is more effective than no treatment. No adverse events directly attributed to the adhesion agents were reported. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. The most common limitations were imprecision and poor reporting of study methods. Most studies were commercially funded, and publication bias could not be ruled out.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000475.pub3DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7043269PMC
April 2015
49 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

second-look laparoscopy
24
low-quality evidence
24
barrier agents
24
participants low-quality
20
regenerated cellulose
20
oxidised regenerated
20
expanded polytetrafluoroethylene
20
evidence
17
novo adhesions
16
difference groups
16
pelvic surgery
16
incidence novo
16
versus treatment
16
gynaecological surgery
16
rcts
14
95%
13
polytetrafluoroethylene gore-tex
12
re-formed adhesions
12
hyaluronate carboxymethylcellulose
12
quality evidence
12

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Microsurgery alone or with Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier for pelvic side wall adhesion re-formation. INTERCEED (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group II
Azziz et al.
Surgery Gynecology & Obstetrics 1993
Prevention of postsurgical adhesions by INTERCEED (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective, randomized multicenter clinical study. INTERCEED (TC7) Adhesion Barrier Study Group
Azziz et al.
Fertility & Sterility 1989
Interceed (TC7) as an adjuvant for adhesion reduction: clinical studies
Malinak et al.
1990
A multicentre clinical evaluation of Interceed (TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier in the treatment of ovarian defects
Franklin et al.
Fertility & Sterility 1993
Prevention of pelvic side wall adhesion reformation using surgical barriers: expanded polytetrafluororethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7). The Adhesion Barrier Study Group:
Haney et al.
Fertility & Sterility 1994
Prevention of pelvic side wall adhesion reformation using surgical barriers: expanded polytetrafluororethylene (Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane) is superior to oxidised regenerated cellulose (Interceed TC7). The Adhesion Barrier Study Group
Haney et al.
Fertility & Sterility 1994
Prevention of adhesion formation/reformation with Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane
March et al.
1993

Similar Publications