Factors affecting institutional delivery in rural Chitwan district of Nepal: a community-based cross-sectional study.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015 Feb 13;15:27. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Background: Health facility delivery is considered a critical strategy to improve maternal health. The Government of Nepal is promoting institutional delivery through different incentive programmes and the establishment of birthing centres. This study aimed to identify the socio-demographic, socio-cultural, and health service-related factors influencing institutional delivery uptake in rural areas of Chitwan district, where high rates of institutional deliveries co-exist with a significant proportion of home deliveries.

Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in six rural Village Development Committees of Chitwan district, which are characterised by relatively low institutional delivery rates and the availability of birthing centres. The study area represents both hilly and plain areas of Chitwan. A total of 673 mothers who had given birth during a one-year-period were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis using stepwise backward elimination was performed to identify key factors affecting institutional delivery.

Results: Adjusting for all other factors in the final model, advantaged caste/ethnicity [aOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.15-3.42], support for institutional delivery by the husband [aOR: 19.85; 95% CI: 8.53-46.21], the decision on place of delivery taken jointly by women and family members [aOR: 5.43; 95% CI: 2.91-10.16] or by family members alone [aOR: 4.61; 95% CI: 2.56-8.28], birth preparations [aOR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.04-2.92], complications during the most recent pregnancy/delivery [aOR: 2.88; 95% CI: 1.67-4.98], a perception that skilled health workers are always available [aOR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.20-6.07] and a birthing facility located within one hour's travelling distance [aOR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.26-3.69] significantly increased the likelihood of institutional delivery. On the other hand, not knowing about the adequacy of physical facilities significantly decreased the likelihood of institutional delivery [aOR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.41].

Conclusion: With multiple incentives present, the decision to deliver in a health facility is affected by a complex interplay of socio-demographic, socio-cultural, and health service-related factors. Family decision-making roles and a husband's support for institutional delivery exert a particularly strong influence on the place of delivery, and this should be emphasized in the health policy as well as development and implementation of maternal health programmes in Nepal.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0454-yDOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339648PMC
February 2015
8 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

institutional delivery
32
chitwan district
12
delivery
11
95%
9
institutional
9
[aor
9
birthing centres
8
cross-sectional study
8
maternal health
8
health
8
health facility
8
members [aor
8
family members
8
community-based cross-sectional
8
centres study
8
place delivery
8
areas chitwan
8
likelihood institutional
8
factors institutional
8
support institutional
8

Similar Publications