From the *Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; †Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, ‡Centre for Excellence in Rural Sexual Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; and §Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Background: To determine the risk-adjusted temporal trend of gonorrhea and chlamydia positivity and associated risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM) attending a sexual health clinic in Melbourne in Australia.
Methods: Gonorrhea and chlamydia positivity by anatomical site adjusted for year of test, age, number of sexual partners, and condom use among MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre from 2007 to 2013 were calculated using generalized estimating equation regression models.
Results: A total of 12,873 MSM were included with a median age of 30.0 years. The proportion with pharyngeal, urethral, and anal gonorrhea was 1.7%, 2.3%, and 2.9%, respectively. The adjusted odds of gonorrhea positivity increased by 9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3%-15%), 11% (95% CI, 6%-17%), and 12% (95% CI, 7%-17%) per year, respectively. The proportion of MSM who were infected with anal chlamydia was 5.6%, with an average increase of 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%) per year; however, no significant change was observed in urethral chlamydia positivity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98-1.06). Increases in gonorrhea and chlamydia positivity were primarily restricted to MSM who reported more than 10 partners in 12 months. The number of partners in the last 12 months fell from 16.6 to 10.5, whereas consistent condom use with casual partners decreased from 64.6% to 58.9% over the study period.
Conclusions: Gonorrhea and chlamydia have increased among MSM despite the decrease in the number of sexual partners and are occurring primarily in MSM with high numbers of partners and persist after adjusting for known risk factors, suggesting that unmeasured factors (e.g., more assortative mixing patterns) may explain the observed changes.
We have submitted your request - we will update you on status within the next 24 hours.
Sign up for further access to Scientific Publications and Authors!
What are PubFacts Points?
PubFacts points are rewards to PubFacts members, which allow you to better promote your profile and articles throughout PubFacts.com
How do I earn PubFacts Points?
Each member is given 50 PubFacts points upon signing up. You can earn additional points by completing 100% of your profile, creating and participating in discussions, and sharing other members research.
What can I do with PubFacts Points?
Currently, you can use PubFacts Points to promote and increase readership of your articles.