Relevance of platinum-sensitivity status in relapsed/refractory extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the modern era: a patient-level analysis of southwest oncology group trials.

J Thorac Oncol 2015 Jan;10(1):110-5

*University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California; †SWOG Statistical Center and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; ‡Humboldt Medical Specialists, Eureka, California; and §Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Background: Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy are traditionally categorized as platinum sensitive (progression ≥ 90 days from last platinum dose) or refractory (progression < 90 days), a practice arising from seminal observations of worse survival in refractory patients. Subsequent trials accounted for platinum sensitivity, resulting in higher sample sizes and increased resource use.

Methods: To assess whether platinum-sensitivity status remains associated with outcomes, patient-level data from recent Southwest Oncology Group trials in second- and/or third-line extensive-stage SCLC were pooled. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) accounting for platinum sensitivity were calculated using unadjusted and adjusted Cox Proportional Hazard models. Recursive partitioning was performed to define prognostic risk groups.

Results: Of 329 patients, 151 were platinum sensitive and 178 refractory. HRs from unadjusted Cox PFS and OS models for refractory versus sensitive disease were 1.0 (95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.25; p = 0.98) and 1.24 (0.99-1.57; p = 0.06), respectively. Adjusted Cox models showed that only elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (HR, 2.04; p < 0.001), males (HR, 1.36; p = 0.04), performance status of 1 (HR, 1.25; p = 0.02), and weight loss greater than or equal to 5% (1.53, p = 0.01) were independently associated with OS. Platinum-sensitivity status was not associated with PFS (HR, 1.11; p = 0.49) or OS (HR, 1.25; p = 0.14), except in a model that excluded 36 patients who received more than one prior chemotherapy regimen (HR, 1.34; p = 0.049). Prognostic groups with differential OS outcomes (high, intermediate, and poor risk) were identified.

Conclusions: Platinum-sensitivity status may no longer be strongly associated with PFS or OS in at least one multivariate model. Validation of prognostic risk groups identified here is warranted. These data have critical implications in the design of future SCLC trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000385DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4320001PMC
January 2015
28 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

platinum-sensitivity status
16
prognostic risk
8
associated pfs
8
lung cancer
8
southwest oncology
8
group trials
8
platinum sensitivity
8
adjusted cox
8
small-cell lung
8
oncology group
8
platinum sensitive
8
extensive-stage small-cell
8
platinum
5
status
5
recursive partitioning
4
refractory hrs
4
partitioning performed
4
hrs unadjusted
4
models recursive
4
unadjusted cox
4

Similar Publications