Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group.

Authors:

Ann Surg Oncol 2015 Jan 15;22(1):256-63. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Background: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors that include several well-defined histologic subtypes. Although surgery is the mainstay of curative therapy, no universally accepted recommendations concerning the best management have been developed to date. Optimization of the initial approach is critical for maximizing patient outcomes.

Methods: An RPS Trans-Atlantic Working Group was established in 2013. The primary aim was to evaluate the current evidence critically and to develop a consensus document on the approach to this difficult disease. The outcome applies to primary RPS that is nonvisceral in origin. The evaluation included sarcomas of major veins (inferior vena cava, renal vein, ovarian/testicular vein), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the psoas, and ureteric leiomyosarcoma (LMS). It excluded desmoid, lipoma and angiomyolipoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, visceral sarcomas such as those arising from the gut or its mesentery, uterine LMS, prostatic sarcoma, paratesticular/spermatic cord sarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, alveolar/embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, primitive peripheral neuro-ectodermal tumor, sarcoma arising from teratoma, carcinosarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, clear cell sarcoma, radiation-induced sarcoma, paraganglioma, and malignant pheochromocytoma.

Results: Management of RPS was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up, and a level of evidence was attributed to each statement. This rare and complex malignancy is best managed by an experienced multidisciplinary team in a specialized referral center. The best chance of cure is at the time of primary presentation, and an individualized management plan should be made based on the statements included in this article.

Conclusions: International collaboration is critical for adding to the current knowledge. A prospective registry will be set up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3965-2DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
January 2015
145 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

working group
8
sarcoma
8
rps
6
mesentery uterine
4
uterine lms
4
prostatic sarcoma
4
lms prostatic
4
gut mesentery
4
sarcomas arising
4
stromal tumors
4
gastrointestinal stromal
4
tumors visceral
4
visceral sarcomas
4
sarcoma paratesticular/spermatic
4
arising gut
4
cord sarcoma
4
neuro-ectodermal tumor
4
peripheral neuro-ectodermal
4
tumor sarcoma
4
sarcoma arising
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

JN Cormier et al.
2014
Article in Ann Surg.
JJ Lewis et al.
Ann Surg. 1998
Article in Cancer.
E Stoeckle et al.
Cancer. 2001
Article in Cancer.
A Gronchi et al.
Cancer. 2004
Article in Ann Surg.
I Hassan et al.
Ann Surg. 2004
Article in Eur J Surg Oncol.
T Dalen van et al.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007
Article in Eur J Surg Oncol.
T Lehnert et al.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009
Article in Ann Surg.
DA Anaya et al.
Ann Surg. 2009
Article in Br J Surg.
DC Strauss et al.
Br J Surg. 2010
Article in J Clin Oncol.
S Bonvalot et al.
J Clin Oncol. 2009

Similar Publications