Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a

    Details and Download Full Text PDF:
    Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.

    J Vis 2014 Oct 3;14(12). Epub 2014 Oct 3.
    Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing, China PKU-IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
    It is well known that directing attention to a location in space enhances the processing efficiency of stimuli presented at that location. Research has also shown that around this area of enhanced processing, there is an inhibitory region within which processing of information is suppressed. In this study, we investigated whether a reward-associated stimulus can break through the inhibitory surround. A distractor that was previously associated with high or low reward was presented near the target with a variable distance between them. For low-reward distractors, only the distractor very close to the target caused interference to target processing; for high-reward distractors, both near and relatively far distractors caused interference, demonstrating that task-irrelevant reward-associated stimuli can capture attention even when presented within the inhibitory surround.
    PDF Download - Full Text Link
    ( Please be advised that this article is hosted on an external website not affiliated with
    Source Status ListingPossible

    Similar Publications

    Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009 Sep 11;62(9):1685-95. Epub 2009 Apr 11.
    The Open University of Israel, Raanana, Israel.
    Distractor stimuli possessing information that is relevant for a task (henceforth, task-relevant distractors) often interfere with task performance. The interference by task-relevant distractors is observed even when distractors are positioned outside the main attentional focus. We investigated whether such interference is due to an attention capture by the distractors. Read More
    Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2010 Jan;63(1):31-41
    University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
    When a visual distractor appears earlier than a visual target in a target-detection task, response time is faster if the distractor appears at the same location as the target. When a visual distractor appears concurrently with a visual target in a target-detection task, response time is slowed relative to when no distractor is presented. Both effects have been taken as evidence of the capture of visual spatial attention, yet capture by early distractors is contingent on top-down attentional control settings (ACSs), and capture by concurrent distractors is not. Read More
    Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.
    Hum Brain Mapp 2015 Dec 29;36(12):5233-51. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
    Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences and Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
    Focusing attention on a target creates a center-surround inhibition such that distractors located close to the target do not capture attention. Recent research showed that a distractor can break through this surround inhibition when associated with reward. However, the brain basis for this reward-based attention is unclear. Read More
    On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades.
    J Vis 2010 May 1;10(5). Epub 2010 May 1.
    Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
    Recent work indicates that covert visual attention and eye movements on the one hand, and covert visual attention and visual working memory on the other hand are closely interrelated. Two experiments address the question whether all three processes draw on the same spatial representations. Participants had to memorize a target location for a subsequent memory-guided saccade. Read More