You are how you recruit: a cohort and randomized controlled trial of recruitment strategies.

BMC Med Res Methodol 2014 Sep 27;14:111. Epub 2014 Sep 27.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Background: Recruitment is a challenge in developing population-representative pregnancy and birth cohorts.

Methods: We developed a collaborative recruitment infrastructure (CRI) to recruit pregnant women for 4 pregnancy cohorts using: faxes from obstetrical offices, in-clinic recruiters, university and funder-driven free-media events, paid-media, and attendance at relevant tradeshows. Recruitment rates and demographic differences were compared between recruitment methods.

Results: We received 5008 referrals over 40 months. Compared to fax, free-media referrals were 13 times more likely to be recruited (OR 13.0, 95% CI 4.2, 40.4: p < 0.001) and paid-media referrals were 4 times more likely to be recruited (OR 4.6, 95% CI 2.1, 10.3: p < 0.001). Among paid-media advertisements, free-to-read print (e.g. Metro) was the most effective (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.3, 4.5: p < 0.05). Several demographic differences were identified between recruitment methods and against a reference population. Between recruitment methods, media recruits had a similar proportion families with incomes ≥ $40,000 (paid-media: 94.4%; free-media: 93.3%) compared to fax recruits (95.7%), while in-clinic recruits were less likely to have family incomes ≥ $40,000 (88.8%, p < 0.05). Maternal recruits from fax and in-clinic were more likely to attend university (Fax: 92.6%, in-clinic 89.8%) versus the reference population (52.0%; p < 0.05 for both) and both were less likely to smoke (Fax: 6.8%, in-clinic 4.2%) versus reference (18.6%; p < 0.05 for both). However, while fax referrals were more likely to be Caucasian (85.9% versus reference 77.5%; p < 0.05), in-clinic referrals were not significantly different (78.2%; P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Recruitment methods result in different recruitment rates and participant demographics. A variety of methods are required to recruit a generalizable sample.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-111DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4190339PMC
September 2014
14 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recruitment methods
12
versus reference
12
recruitment
9
referrals times
8
demographic differences
8
recruitment rates
8
compared fax
8
0001 paid-media
8
≥ $40000
8
incomes ≥
8
reference population
8
times recruited
8
in-clinic
6
fax
6
005
5
referrals
5
free-to-read print
4
95% 005
4
005 demographic
4
effective 95%
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

RJ Prescott et al.
Health Technol Assess 1999

LC Lovato et al.
Control Clin Trials 1997

DA Savitz et al.
Epidemiology 2010

JH Promislow et al.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004

J Golding et al.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001

AE Guttmacher et al.
N Engl J Med 2013

S Kenyon et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2006

S Mihrshahi et al.
Respirology 2002

S McIntosh et al.
Nicotine Tob Res 2000

Similar Publications