Consumer demand for surgical innovation: a systematic review of public perception of NOTES.

Surg Endosc 2015 Apr 27;29(4):774-80. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

Department of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, W2 1NY, UK.

Background: The full scope of benefits offered by NOTES over traditional laparoscopy, if any, is not yet fully clear. Perceived patient demand for truly "scarless surgery" is often referenced one of the driving factors in the continued development of this relatively new technique. The true scale of patient preference and demand for NOTES as a surgical technique is unknown. This review aims to summarise currently available literature on the topic of patient perceptions of NOTES to guide future development of the technique.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science electronic databases was performed on 1st Jan 2014. To be considered for inclusion, articles were required to assess and report the perception of NOTES in a sample of laypersons (patients or general public). The primary endpoint assessed was acceptance or preference rates expressed by patients for NOTES procedures. Reasons given for preference or rejection of NOTES were recorded, as well as preferred access routes and any predicting factors of NOTES acceptance.

Results: Initial search returned 1,334 results, resulting in 15 articles included in final data synthesis. These polled a total of 4,420 subjects. Acceptance of NOTES ranged between 41 and 84 %. Compared to a laparoscopic approach, preference rates for NOTES ranged from 0 to 78 %. Reasons for preferring NOTES were largely centred on potentially reduced recovery time, complications (particularly with reference to hernias) and postoperative pain. Improved cosmesis also played a role, but was secondary to the above issues. Overall, study quality was poor.

Conclusions: This review suggests significant public interest in NOTES and scarless surgery in general. Further research and consideration of differences in public perceptions across regions, countries and cultures are required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3769-2DOI Listing
April 2015
20 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

notes
12
notes ranged
8
preference rates
8
perception notes
8
preferred access
4
routes predicting
4
access routes
4
well preferred
4
rejection notes
4
procedures reasons
4
reasons preference
4
preference rejection
4
notes recorded
4
recorded well
4
predicting factors
4
articles included
4
1334 articles
4
included final
4
final data
4
data synthesis
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

GS Litynski et al.
JSLS 1998

G Navarra et al.
Br J Surg 1997

AN Kalloo et al.
Gastrointest Endosc 2004

SA Antoniou et al.
Am J Surg 2014

MS Sajid et al.
World J Surg 2012

KS Lehmann et al.
Ann Surg 2010

MH Sodergren et al.
Diagn Ther Endosc 2011

E Rieder et al.
Surg Endosc 2011

R Zorron et al.
Surg Innov 2010

A Rao et al.
Surg Endosc 2010

D Rattner et al.
Surg Endosc 2006

Similar Publications