A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of pentoxifylline on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness in anemic patients with CKD: the Handling Erythropoietin Resistance With Oxpentifylline (HERO) trial.

Am J Kidney Dis 2015 Jan 10;65(1):49-57. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsive anemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pentoxifylline shows promise as a treatment for ESA-hyporesponsive anemia, but has not been rigorously evaluated.

Study Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting & Participants: 53 adult patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 (including dialysis) and ESA-hyporesponsive anemia (hemoglobin≤120g/L and ESA resistance index [calculated as weight-adjusted weekly ESA dose in IU/kg/wk divided by hemoglobin concentration in g/L]≥1.0IU/kg/wk/g/L for erythropoietin-treated patients and ≥0.005μg/kg/wk/g/L for darbepoetin-treated patients).

Interventions: Pentoxifylline (400mg/d; n=26) or matching placebo (control; n=27) for 4 months.

Outcomes:

Primary Outcome: ESA resistance index at 4 months; secondary outcomes: hemoglobin concentration, ESA dose, blood transfusion requirement, serum ferritin level and transferrin saturation, C-reactive protein level, adverse events, quality of life, and health economics.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference in ESA resistance index between the pentoxifylline and control groups (adjusted mean difference, -0.39 [95%CI, -0.89 to 0.10] IU/kg/wk/g/L; P=0.1). Pentoxifylline significantly increased hemoglobin concentration relative to the control group (adjusted mean difference, 7.6 [95%CI, 1.7-13.5] g/L; P=0.01). There was no difference in ESA dose between groups (-20.8 [95%CI, -67.2 to 25.7] IU/kg/wk; P=0.4). No differences in blood transfusion requirements, adverse events, or quality of life were observed between groups. Pentoxifylline cost A$88.05 (US $82.94) per person over the trial and produced mean savings in ESA cost of A$1,332 (US $1,255). The overall economic impact over the trial period was a saving of A$1,244 (US $1,172) per person for the pentoxifylline group compared with controls.

Limitations: Sample size smaller than planned due to slow recruitment.

Conclusions: Pentoxifylline did not significantly modify ESA hyporesponsiveness, but increased hemoglobin concentration. Further studies are warranted to determine whether pentoxifylline therapy represents a safe strategy for increasing hemoglobin levels in patients with CKD with ESA-hyporesponsive anemia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0272638614009871/1-s2.0-S027263861400
Web Search
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027263861400987
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.020DOI Listing
January 2015
49 Reads
5 Citations
5.900 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

esa-hyporesponsive anemia
16
hemoglobin concentration
16
patients ckd
12
esa resistance
12
esa dose
12
pentoxifylline
9
adverse events
8
events quality
8
esa
8
difference esa
8
quality life
8
increased hemoglobin
8
erythropoiesis-stimulating agent
8
blood transfusion
8
hemoglobin
5
transfusion requirement
4
group compared
4
outcome esa
4
requirement serum
4
iu/kg/wk p=04
4

Similar Publications