Diverse convergent evidence in the genetic analysis of complex disease: coordinating omic, informatic, and experimental evidence to better identify and validate risk factors.

BioData Min 2014 30;7:10. Epub 2014 Jun 30.

Department of Genetics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

In omic research, such as genome wide association studies, researchers seek to repeat their results in other datasets to reduce false positive findings and thus provide evidence for the existence of true associations. Unfortunately this standard validation approach cannot completely eliminate false positive conclusions, and it can also mask many true associations that might otherwise advance our understanding of pathology. These issues beg the question: How can we increase the amount of knowledge gained from high throughput genetic data? To address this challenge, we present an approach that complements standard statistical validation methods by drawing attention to both potential false negative and false positive conclusions, as well as providing broad information for directing future research. The Diverse Convergent Evidence approach (DiCE) we propose integrates information from multiple sources (omics, informatics, and laboratory experiments) to estimate the strength of the available corroborating evidence supporting a given association. This process is designed to yield an evidence metric that has utility when etiologic heterogeneity, variable risk factor frequencies, and a variety of observational data imperfections might lead to false conclusions. We provide proof of principle examples in which DiCE identified strong evidence for associations that have established biological importance, when standard validation methods alone did not provide support. If used as an adjunct to standard validation methods this approach can leverage multiple distinct data types to improve genetic risk factor discovery/validation, promote effective science communication, and guide future research directions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-7-10DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4112852PMC
July 2014
78 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validation methods
12
standard validation
12
false positive
12
convergent evidence
8
diverse convergent
8
true associations
8
positive conclusions
8
risk factor
8
evidence
7
false
5
omics informatics
4
informatics laboratory
4
dice propose
4
sources omics
4
integrates multiple
4
propose integrates
4
multiple sources
4
laboratory experiments
4
estimate strength
4
association process
4

Altmetric Statistics

Similar Publications