Environmental equity research: review with focus on outdoor air pollution research methods and analytic tools.

Authors:
Qun Miao
Qun Miao
Queen's University
Canada
Dongmei Chen
Dongmei Chen
MOA Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products
China
Michael Buzzelli
Michael Buzzelli
University of British Columbia
Canada
Kristan J Aronson
Kristan J Aronson
Queen's University
Canada

Arch Environ Occup Health 2015 ;70(1):47-55

a Department of Public Health Sciences , Queen's University , Kingston , Ontario , Canada.

The objective of this study was to review environmental equity research on outdoor air pollution and, specifically, methods and tools used in research, published in English, with the aim of recommending the best methods and analytic tools. English language publications from 2000 to 2012 were identified in Google Scholar, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed. Research methodologies and results were reviewed and potential deficiencies and knowledge gaps identified. The publications show that exposure to outdoor air pollution differs by social factors, but findings are inconsistent in Canada. In terms of study designs, most were small and ecological and therefore prone to the ecological fallacy. Newer tools such as geographic information systems, modeling, and biomarkers offer improved precision in exposure measurement. Higher-quality research using large, individual-based samples and more precise analytic tools are needed to provide better evidence for policy-making to reduce environmental inequities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2014.904266DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

Sign up to send a request to the authors directly.
February 2015
242 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

air pollution
12
analytic tools
12
outdoor air
12
methods analytic
8
pollution methods
8
environmental equity
8
tools
5
pubmed methodologies
4
medline pubmed
4
geographic systems
4
systems modeling
4
methodologies reviewed
4
potential deficiencies
4
newer tools
4
reviewed potential
4
tools geographic
4
2012 identified
4
identified google
4
scholar ovid
4
offer improved
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Similar Publications