Prostate stereotactic ablative radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy to dominant intraprostatic lesions.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014 Jun 28;89(2):406-15. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Purpose: To investigate boosting dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs) in the context of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) and to examine the impact on tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Methods And Materials: Ten prostate datasets were selected. DILs were defined using T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Four plans were produced for each dataset: (1) no boost to DILs; (2) boost to DILs, no seminal vesicles in prescription; (3) boost to DILs, proximal seminal vesicles (proxSV) prescribed intermediate dose; and (4) boost to DILs, proxSV prescribed higher dose. The prostate planning target volume (PTV) prescription was 42.7 Gy in 7 fractions. DILs were initially prescribed 115% of the PTV(Prostate) prescription, and PTV(DIL) prescriptions were increased in 5% increments until organ-at-risk constraints were reached. TCP and NTCP calculations used the LQ-Poisson Marsden, and Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models respectively.

Results: When treating the prostate alone, the median PTV(DIL) prescription was 125% (range: 110%-140%) of the PTV(Prostate) prescription. Median PTV(DIL) D50% was 55.1 Gy (range: 49.6-62.6 Gy). The same PTV(DIL) prescriptions and similar PTV(DIL) median doses were possible when including the proxSV within the prescription. TCP depended on prostate α/β ratio and was highest with an α/β ratio = 1.5 Gy, where the additional TCP benefit of DIL boosting was least. Rectal NTCP increased with DIL boosting and was considered unacceptably high in 5 cases, which, when replanned with an emphasis on reducing maximum dose to 0.5 cm(3) of rectum (Dmax(0.5cc)), as well as meeting existing constraints, resulted in considerable rectal NTCP reductions.

Conclusions: Boosting DILs in the context of SABR is technically feasible but should be approached with caution. If this therapy is adopted, strict rectal constraints are required including Dmax(0.5cc). If the α/β ratio of prostate cancer is 1.5 Gy or less, then high TCP and low NTCP can be achieved by prescribing SABR to the whole prostate, without the need for DIL boosting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.042DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4018668PMC
June 2014

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

boost dils
16
α/β ratio
12
dil boosting
12
intraprostatic lesions
8
dominant intraprostatic
8
dils
8
ptvdil prescriptions
8
proxsv prescribed
8
seminal vesicles
8
ptvprostate prescription
8
rectal ntcp
8
dils context
8
median ptvdil
8
ablative radiation
8
stereotactic ablative
8
radiation therapy
8
prostate
7
prescription
6
boosting
5
tcp
5

Similar Publications