A portable centrifugal analyser for liver function screening.

Authors:
Charles E Nwankire
Charles E Nwankire
Dublin City University
Ireland
Monika Czugala
Monika Czugala
Dublin City University
Ireland
Robert Burger
Robert Burger
University of California
United States
Kevin J Fraser
Kevin J Fraser
Dublin City University
Thomas Glennon
Thomas Glennon
Biomedical Diagnostics Institute
Blessing E Onwuliri
Blessing E Onwuliri
Abia State University Teaching Hospital
Nigeria
Isikaku E Nduaguibe
Isikaku E Nduaguibe
Abia State University Teaching Hospital

Biosens Bioelectron 2014 Jun 27;56:352-8. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

Biomedical Diagnostics Institute, National Centre for Sensor Research, Dublin City University, Ireland; School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Ireland.

Mortality rates of up to 50% have been reported after liver failure due to drug-induced hepatotoxicity and certain viral infections (Gao et al., 2008). These adverse conditions frequently affect HIV and tuberculosis patients on regular medication in resource-poor settings. Here, we report full integration of sample preparation with the read-out of a 5-parameter liver assay panel (LAP) on a portable, easy-to-use, fast and cost-efficient centrifugal microfluidic analysis system (CMAS). Our unique, dissolvable-film based centrifugo-pneumatic valving was employed to provide sample-to-answer fashion automation for plasma extraction (from finger-prick of blood), metering and aliquoting into separate reaction chambers for parallelized colorimetric quantification during rotation. The entire LAP completes in less than 20 min while using only a tenth the reagent volumes when compared with standard hospital laboratory tests. Accuracy of in-situ liver function screening was validated by 96 separate tests with an average coefficient of variance (CV) of 7.9% compared to benchtop and hospital lab tests. Unpaired two sample statistical t-tests were used to compare the means of CMAS and benchtop reader, on one hand; and CMAS and hospital tests on the other. The results demonstrate no statistical difference between the respective means with 94% and 92% certainty of equivalence, respectively. The portable platform thus saves significant time, labour and costs compared to established technologies, and therefore complies with typical restrictions on lab infrastructure, maintenance, operator skill and costs prevalent in many field clinics of the developing world. It has been successfully deployed to a centralised lab in Nigeria.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.031DOI Listing
June 2014
32 Reads
8 PubMed Central Citations(source)
6.41 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

function screening
8
liver function
8
tests
4
tests accuracy
4
accuracy in-situ
4
laboratory tests
4
hospital laboratory
4
reagent volumes
4
tenth reagent
4
volumes compared
4
compared standard
4
standard hospital
4
in-situ liver
4
validated separate
4
79% compared
4
compared benchtop
4
benchtop hospital
4
hospital lab
4
variance 79%
4
coefficient variance
4

Similar Publications