A task-based approach for Gene Ontology evaluation.

J Biomed Semantics 2013 Apr 15;4 Suppl 1:S4. Epub 2013 Apr 15.

The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Background: The Gene Ontology and its associated annotations are critical tools for interpreting lists of genes. Here, we introduce a method for evaluating the Gene Ontology annotations and structure based on the impact they have on gene set enrichment analysis, along with an example implementation. This task-based approach yields quantitative assessments grounded in experimental data and anchored tightly to the primary use of the annotations.

Results: Applied to specific areas of biological interest, our framework allowed us to understand the progress of annotation and structural ontology changes from 2004 to 2012. Our framework was also able to determine that the quality of annotations and structure in the area under test have been improving in their ability to recall underlying biological traits. Furthermore, we were able to distinguish between the impact of changes to the annotation sets and ontology structure.

Conclusion: Our framework and implementation lay the groundwork for a powerful tool in evaluating the usefulness of the Gene Ontology. We demonstrate both the flexibility and the power of this approach in evaluating the current and past state of the Gene Ontology as well as its applicability in developing new methods for creating gene annotations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-4-S1-S4DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3633003PMC
April 2013
4 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gene ontology
20
annotations structure
8
evaluating gene
8
task-based approach
8
ontology
7
gene
7
determine quality
4
framework determine
4
quality annotations
4
2004 2012
4
structure area
4
2012 framework
4
ability recall
4
recall underlying
4
underlying biological
4
changes 2004
4
improving ability
4
test improving
4
area test
4
annotation structural
4

Altmetric Statistics

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

Similar Publications