Maximizing tibial coverage is detrimental to proper rotational alignment.

Authors:
Sabir Ismaily
Sabir Ismaily
Institute of Orthopedic Research and Education
United States
Philip Noble
Philip Noble
Baylor College of Medicine
Stephen J Incavo
Stephen J Incavo
Houston Methodist Hospital
Houston | United States

Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014 Jan;472(1):121-5

Methodist Center for Orthopaedic Surgery, 6550 Fannin, Suite 2600, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Background: Traditionally, the placement of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has focused on maximizing coverage of the tibial surface. However, the degree to which maximal coverage affects correct rotational placement of symmetric and asymmetric tibial components has not been well defined and might represent an implant design issue worthy of further inquiry.

Questions/purposes: Using four commercially available tibial components (two symmetric, two asymmetric), we sought to determine (1) the overall amount of malrotation that would occur if components were placed for maximal tibial coverage; and (2) whether the asymmetric designs would result in less malrotation than the symmetric designs when placed for maximal coverage in a computer model using CT reconstructions.

Methods: CT reconstructions of 30 tibial specimens were used to generate three-dimensional tibia reconstructions with attention to the tibial anatomic axis, the tibial tubercle, and the resected tibial surface. Using strict criteria, four commercially available tibial designs (two symmetric, two asymmetric) were placed on the resected tibial surface. The resulting component rotation was examined.

Results: Among all four designs, 70% of all tibial components placed in orientation maximizing fit to resection surface were internally malrotated (average 9°). The asymmetric designs had fewer cases of malrotation (28% and 52% for the two asymmetric designs, 100% and 96% for the two symmetric designs; p < 0.001) and less malrotation on average (2° and 5° for the asymmetric designs, 14° for both symmetric designs; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Maximizing tibial coverage resulted in implant malrotation in a large percentage of cases. Given similar amounts of tibial coverage, correct rotational positioning was more likely to occur with the asymmetric designs.

Clinical Relevance: Malrotation of components is an important cause of failure in TKA. Priority should be given to correct tibial rotational positioning. This study suggested that it is easier to balance rotation and coverage with asymmetric tibial baseplates; clinical research will need to determine whether the observed difference affects patellar tracking, loosening rates, or the likelihood of revisions after TKA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3047-yDOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3889435PMC

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
January 2014
19 Reads
2.770 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tibial
16
asymmetric designs
16
tibial coverage
16
symmetric asymmetric
12
tibial components
12
symmetric designs
12
tibial surface
12
asymmetric
9
designs
9
correct rotational
8
maximal coverage
8
coverage correct
8
commercially tibial
8
rotational positioning
8
coverage asymmetric
8
asymmetric tibial
8
resected tibial
8
coverage
8
maximizing tibial
8
malrotation
6

Similar Publications