The high-quality draft genome of peach (Prunus persica) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution.

Authors:

Nat Genet 2013 May 24;45(5):487-94. Epub 2013 Mar 24.

Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura (CRA)-Centro di Ricerca per la Frutticoltura, Rome, Italy.

Rosaceae is the most important fruit-producing clade, and its key commercially relevant genera (Fragaria, Rosa, Rubus and Prunus) show broadly diverse growth habits, fruit types and compact diploid genomes. Peach, a diploid Prunus species, is one of the best genetically characterized deciduous trees. Here we describe the high-quality genome sequence of peach obtained from a completely homozygous genotype. We obtained a complete chromosome-scale assembly using Sanger whole-genome shotgun methods. We predicted 27,852 protein-coding genes, as well as noncoding RNAs. We investigated the path of peach domestication through whole-genome resequencing of 14 Prunus accessions. The analyses suggest major genetic bottlenecks that have substantially shaped peach genome diversity. Furthermore, comparative analyses showed that peach has not undergone recent whole-genome duplication, and even though the ancestral triplicated blocks in peach are fragmentary compared to those in grape, all seven paleosets of paralogs from the putative paleoancestor are detectable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.2586DOI Listing
May 2013
60 Reads
156 Citations
29.350 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peach
7
whole-genome shotgun
4
methods predicted
4
shotgun methods
4
sanger whole-genome
4
chromosome-scale assembly
4
assembly sanger
4
predicted 27852
4
protein-coding genes
4
rnas investigated
4
investigated path
4
noncoding rnas
4
well noncoding
4
complete chromosome-scale
4
genes well
4
27852 protein-coding
4
homozygous genotype
4
genetically characterized
4
characterized deciduous
4
best genetically
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

M Faust et al.
Hortic. Rev. (Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.) 1995

V Shulaev et al.
Nat. Genet. 2011

T Debener et al.
Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2009

R Meng et al.
J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2002

K Arumuganathan et al.
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1991

DB Jaffe et al.
Genome Res. 2003

W Howad et al.
Genetics 2005

PSG Chain et al.
Science 2009

R Velasco et al.
Nat. Genet. 2010

P SanMiguel et al.
Nat. Genet. 1998

Similar Publications