A Monte Carlo and experimental investigation of the dosimetric behavior of low- and medium-perturbation diodes used for entrance in vivo dosimetry in megavoltage photon beams.

Authors:
Prof. Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, PhD
Prof. Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, PhD
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Professor
Medical Physics
Isfahan, Isfahan | Iran (Islamic Republic of)

J Appl Clin Med Phys 2012 Nov 8;13(6):3917. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

Physics Unit, Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology and Centre for Research in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Full buildup diodes can cause significant dose perturbation if they are used on most or all of radiotherapy fractions. Given the importance of frequent in vivo measurements in complex treatments, using thin buildup (low-perturbation) diodes instead is gathering interest. However, such diodes are strictly unsuitable for high-energy photons; therefore, their use requires evaluation and careful measurement of correction factors (CFs). There is little published data on such factors for low-perturbation diodes, and none on diode characterization for 9 MV X-rays. We report on MCNP4c Monte Carlo models of low-perturbation (EDD5) and medium-perturbation (EDP10) diodes, and a comparison of source-to-surface distance, field size, temperature, and orientation CFs for cobalt-60 and 9 MV beams. Most of the simulation results were within 4% of the measurements. The results suggest against the use of the EDD5 in axial angles beyond ± 50° and exceeding the range 0° to +50° tilt angle at 9 MV. Outside these ranges, although the EDD5 can be used for accurate in vivo dosimetry at 9 MV, its CF variations were found to be 1.5-7.1 times larger than the EDP10 and, therefore, should be applied carefully. Finally, the MCNP diode models are sufficiently reliable tools for independent verification of potentially inaccurate measurements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5718541PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3917DOI Listing
November 2012
99 Reads
3 Citations
1.110 Impact Factor

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vivo dosimetry
8
low-perturbation diodes
8
monte carlo
8
diodes
6
edp10 diodes
4
diodes comparison
4
medium-perturbation edp10
4
edd5 medium-perturbation
4
low-perturbation edd5
4
comparison source-to-surface
4
source-to-surface distance
4
orientation cfs
4
cfs cobalt-60
4
cobalt-60 beams
4
temperature orientation
4
size temperature
4
distance field
4
field size
4
models low-perturbation
4
report mcnp4c
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
Prevention of accidental exposures to patients undergoing radiation therapy et al.
Ann ICRP. 2000

The Royal College of Radiologists et al.
2008
Hidalgo-Salvatierra O. Characterization of an in vivo diode dosimetry system for clinical use
Huang et al.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2003
Radiotherapy techniques for intracranial tumours
Mosleh-Shirazi et al.
Iran J Radiat Res. 2006
In vivo dosimetry during external photon beam radiotherapy
Essers et al.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999
Safe and judicious use of advanced radiotherapy techniques and equipment: a medical physicist's perspective on recent accident reports [editorial]
Mosleh-Shirazi et al.
Middle East J of Cancer. 2010
Radiation dose monitoring in a breast cancer patient with a pacemaker: a case report
Nibhanupudy et al.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2001

Similar Publications