Correcting for the influence of sampling conditions on biomarkers of exposure to phenols and phthalates: a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals.

Environ Health 2012 Apr 26;11:29. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

Team of Environmental Epidemiology Applied to Reproduction and Respiratory Health, Inserm, Institut Albert Bonniot (U823), Grenoble, France.

Background: Environmental epidemiology and biomonitoring studies typically rely on biological samples to assay the concentration of non-persistent exposure biomarkers. Between-participant variations in sampling conditions of these biological samples constitute a potential source of exposure misclassification. Few studies attempted to correct biomarker levels for this error. We aimed to assess the influence of sampling conditions on concentrations of urinary biomarkers of select phenols and phthalates, two widely-produced families of chemicals, and to standardize biomarker concentrations on sampling conditions.

Methods: Urine samples were collected between 2002 and 2006 among 287 pregnant women from Eden and Pélagie cohorts, from which phthalates and phenols metabolites levels were assayed. We applied a 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals. First, the influence of sampling conditions (including sampling hour, duration of storage before freezing) and of creatinine levels on biomarker concentrations were characterized using adjusted linear regression models. In the second step, the model estimates were used to remove the variability in biomarker concentrations due to sampling conditions and to standardize concentrations as if all samples had been collected under the same conditions (e.g., same hour of urine collection).

Results: Sampling hour was associated with concentrations of several exposure biomarkers. After standardization for sampling conditions, median concentrations differed by--38% for 2,5-dichlorophenol to +80 % for a metabolite of diisodecyl phthalate. However, at the individual level, standardized biomarker levels were strongly correlated (correlation coefficients above 0.80) with unstandardized measures.

Conclusions: Sampling conditions, such as sampling hour, should be systematically collected in biomarker-based studies, in particular when the biomarker half-life is short. The 2-step standardization method based on regression residuals that we proposed in order to limit the impact of heterogeneity in sampling conditions could be further tested in studies describing levels of biomarkers or their influence on health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-069
Publisher Site
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-29DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533777PMC
April 2012
8 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sampling conditions
32
2-step standardization
12
method based
12
based regression
12
sampling hour
12
regression residuals
12
biomarker concentrations
12
standardization method
12
sampling
12
influence sampling
12
conditions
9
samples collected
8
biomarker levels
8
biological samples
8
concentrations sampling
8
exposure biomarkers
8
phenols phthalates
8
concentrations
7
biomarker
6
levels
5

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

C Pereira et al.
Acta Histochem 2007

FS vom Saal et al.
Reprod Toxicol 2007

JJ Adibi et al.
Environ Health Perspect 2003

X Ye et al.
Int J Hyg Environ Health 2009

X Ye et al.
Environ Res 2008

PM Foster et al.
Int J Androl 2006

J Hogberg et al.
Environ Health Perspect 2008

X Ye et al.
Anal Bioanal Chem 2005

HM Koch et al.
Arch Toxicol 2004

W Volkel et al.
Chem Res Toxicol 2002

Similar Publications