Comparison of conventional continuous positive airway pressure to continuous positive airway pressure titration performed with sleep endoscopy.

Laryngoscope 2012 Mar 17;122(3):691-5. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sisli Etfal Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Objectives/hypothesis: To evaluate the effect and obtain a pressure value of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) under direct visualization using drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and compare the pressure values with values obtained using conventional CPAP.

Study Design: Prospective, double-blinded, cohort study.

Methods: Sixteen patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were included in the study. Each patient underwent polysomnographic evaluation. After diagnosis of OSAS, patients underwent conventional CPAP titration. Patients were then taken to the operating theatre and put under sedation, where CPAP titration with nasendoscopy was performed (DISE CPAP).

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two techniques regarding pressure levels that decreased apneas in conventional CPAP and provided sufficient opening during DISE CPAP.

Conclusions: Results with conventional CPAP titration and endoscopy-assisted CPAP titration showed no statistically significant difference. Endoscopy-assisted CPAP is a cheaper and less time consuming alternative to conventional CPAP and has similar results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.22494DOI Listing
March 2012
52 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cpap titration
16
conventional cpap
16
continuous positive
12
positive airway
12
airway pressure
12
pressure continuous
8
cpap
8
sleep endoscopy
8
endoscopy-assisted cpap
8
pressure
6
titration
5
conventional
5
opening dise
4
patient underwent
4
study patient
4
polysomnographic evaluation
4
diagnosis osas
4
evaluation diagnosis
4
sufficient opening
4
underwent polysomnographic
4

Similar Publications