Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a
    Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities.
    Annu Rev Psychol 2012 11;63:427-52. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
    Center for Reading and Language Research, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
    Fluent reading depends on a complex set of cognitive processes that must work together in perfect concert. Rapid automatized naming (RAN) tasks provide insight into this system, acting as a microcosm of the processes involved in reading. In this review, we examine both RAN and reading fluency and how each has shaped our understanding of reading disabilities. We explore the research that led to our current understanding of the relationships between RAN and reading and what makes RAN unique as a cognitive measure. We explore how the automaticity that supports RAN affects reading across development, reading abilities, and languages, and the biological bases of these processes. Finally, we bring these converging areas of knowledge together by examining what the collective studies of RAN and reading fluency contribute to our goals of creating optimal assessments and interventions that help every child become a fluent, comprehending reader.

    Similar Publications

    The role of rapid naming in reading development and dyslexia in Chinese.
    J Exp Child Psychol 2015 Feb 30;130:106-22. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
    Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G5, Canada. Electronic address:
    We examined in a series of studies the mechanism that may underlie the relationship between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and reading (accuracy and fluency) in Mandarin Chinese. Study 1 examined the "arbitrary" connections hypothesis in a sample of Grade 2 children (N=182). Study 2 contrasted the phonological processing, orthographic processing, and speed of processing hypotheses in a sample of Grade 2 children followed until Grade 5 (N=72). Read More
    Effects of sequential and discrete rapid naming on reading in Japanese children with reading difficulty.
    Brain Dev 2011 Jun 19;33(6):487-93. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
    Faculty of Nursing and Rehabilitations, Aino University, Osaka, Japan.
    To clarify whether rapid naming ability itself is a main underpinning factor of rapid automatized naming tests (RAN) and how deep an influence the discrete decoding process has on reading, we performed discrete naming tasks and discrete hiragana reading tasks as well as sequential naming tasks and sequential hiragana reading tasks with 38 Japanese schoolchildren with reading difficulty. There were high correlations between both discrete and sequential hiragana reading and sentence reading, suggesting that some mechanism which automatizes hiragana reading makes sentence reading fluent. In object and color tasks, there were moderate correlations between sentence reading and sequential naming, and between sequential naming and discrete naming. Read More
    Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: an eye-tracking study.
    Cognition 2008 Dec 18;109(3):389-407. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
    Department of Psychology (School: Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences), University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh EH89JZ, UK.
    The relationship between rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency is well documented (see Wolf, M. & Bowers, P.G. Read More
    Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists.
    Psychon Bull Rev 2009 Jun;16(3):567-72
    University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
    Rapid automatized naming (RAN; Denckla & Rudel, 1976) tasks are consistent predictors of fluency that also discriminate between dyslexic and nondyslexic reading groups. The component processes of RAN that are responsible for its relationship with reading ability remain underspecified, however. We report a study on dyslexic and nondyslexic adult groups that experimentally manipulated RAN formats to elucidate how different components of RAN differentially influence dyslexic and nondyslexic performance. Read More