The mismeasure of science: Stephen Jay Gould versus Samuel George Morton on skulls and bias.

PLoS Biol 2011 Jun 7;9(6):e1001071. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001071DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3110184PMC
June 2011
4 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

samuel george
4
versus samuel
4
george morton
4
morton skulls
4
skulls bias
4
jay gould
4
gould versus
4
science stephen
4
mismeasure science
4
stephen jay
4
skulls
1
stephen
1
bias
1
morton
1
jay
1
versus
1
mismeasure
1
samuel
1
george
1
gould
1

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Primate visions: gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science.
D Haraway et al.
1989
Value-free science? Ideals and illusions.
2007
Why I am not a scientist: anthropology and modern knowledge.
J Marks et al.
2009
The mismeasure of man.
S. J Gould et al.
1981
The leopard's spots.
W Stanton et al.
1960
Crania Americana; or, a comparative view of the skulls of various aboriginal nations of North and South America: to which is prefixed an essay on the varieties of the human species.
S. G Morton et al.
1839
Crania Aegyptiaca; or, observations on Egyptian ethnography, derived from anatomy, history, and the monuments.
S. G Morton et al.
1844
Catalogue of skulls of man and the inferior animals, Third Edition.
S. G Morton et al.
1849
“Race” is a four-letter word: the genesis of the concept.
C. L Brace et al.
2005

Similar Publications