Comparative analysis of phosphoprotein expression using 2D-DIGE.

Methods Mol Biol 2011 ;744:225-33

Division of Functional Genomics, Advanced Science Research Center, Kanazawa University, 920-0934 Kanazawa, Japan.

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) has often been used to compare protein expression pattern between different samples. This method is also useful to compare protein expression between wild-type and RNAi plants. 2D-DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis) was developed to perform quantitative proteomics of two or more samples. In this method, proteins are fluorescently labeled by Cy2, Cy3, or Cy5 and are mixed and subjected to electrophoresis on the same gel, thereby gel-to-gel variations are eliminated. We perform phosphoproteomics between Arabidopsis wild-type and a stress-activated MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) mutant after the phytotoxin treatment. For this purpose, proteins are extracted from both samples, and then phosphorylated proteins are purified by phosphoprotein enrichment columns. Purified proteins are fluorescently labeled by different CyDyes using the minimum labeling method. The labeled protein samples are separated on the same gel by 2-DE, and gels are scanned by a variable mode laser imager. Then, high-resolution images are analyzed by 2D analysis software. Thus, we identified several phosphoprotein spots that were differentially accumulated between wild-type and mapk mutant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-123-9_16DOI Listing
August 2011
16 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

samples method
8
fluorescently labeled
8
gel electrophoresis
8
proteins fluorescently
8
compare protein
8
protein expression
8
purpose proteins
4
treatment purpose
4
proteins extracted
4
samples phosphorylated
4
phosphoprotein enrichment
4
enrichment columns
4
columns purified
4
purified phosphoprotein
4
proteins purified
4
phytotoxin treatment
4
phosphorylated proteins
4
extracted samples
4
kinase mutant
4
eliminated perform
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)

S. Bentem de la Fuente van et al.
Proteomics 2008

K. S. Lilley et al.
J. Exp. Bot. 2006

M. Unl├╝ et al.
Electrophoresis 1997

J. F. Timms et al.
Proteomics 2008

J. S. Minden et al.
Electrophoresis 2009

T. Hrebicek et al.
Electrophoresis 2007

D. L. Sudakin et al.
Toxicol. Lett. 2003

T. Nishiuchi et al.
Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2006

Similar Publications