Assessment of caregiver responsibility in unintentional child injury deaths: challenges for injury prevention.

Authors:
Patricia G Schnitzer
Patricia G Schnitzer
University of Missouri
United States
Theresa M Covington
Theresa M Covington
University of Missouri
United States
Robin L Kruse
Robin L Kruse
University of Missouri
United States

Inj Prev 2011 Feb;17 Suppl 1:i45-54

Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Most unintentional injury deaths among young children result from inadequate supervision or failure by caregivers to protect the child from potential hazards. Determining whether inadequate supervision or failure to protect could be classified as child neglect is a component of child death review (CDR) in most states. However, establishing that an unintentional injury death was neglect related can be challenging as differing definitions, lack of standards regarding supervision, and changing norms make consensus difficult. The purpose of this study was to assess CDR team members' categorisation of the extent to which unintentional injury deaths were neglect related. CDR team members were surveyed and asked to classify 20 vignettes-presented in 10 pairs-that described the circumstances of unintentional injury deaths among children. Vignette pairs differed by an attribute that might affect classification, such as poverty or intent. Categories for classifying vignettes were: (1) caregiver not responsible/not neglect related; (2) some caregiver responsibility/somewhat neglect related; (3) caregiver responsible /definitely neglect related. CDR team members from five states (287) completed surveys. Respondents assigned the child's caregiver at least some responsibility for the death in 18 vignettes (90%). A majority of respondents classified the caregiver as definitely responsible for the child's death in eight vignettes (40%). This study documents attributes that influence CDR team members' decisions when assessing caregiver responsibility in unintentional injury deaths, including supervision, intent, failure to use safety devices, and a pattern of previous neglectful behaviour. The findings offer insight for incorporating injury prevention into CDR more effectively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.027094DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
February 2011
10 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unintentional injury
20
injury deaths
20
cdr team
16
caregiver responsibility
12
inadequate supervision
8
injury prevention
8
supervision failure
8
neglect caregiver
8
neglect cdr
8
team members
8
team members'
8
death vignettes
8
injury
8
responsibility unintentional
8
cdr
6
caregiver
6
unintentional
6
neglect
6
deaths
5
categories classifying
4

Similar Publications