Obstacles and challenges following the partial decriminalisation of abortion in Colombia.

Reprod Health Matters 2010 Nov;18(36):118-26

Department of Philosophy & Centre for the History of Medicine and Disease, Durham University, Durham, UK.

During a highly contested process, abortion was partially decriminalised in Colombia in 2006 by the Constitutional Court: when the pregnancy threatens a woman's life or health, in cases of severe fetal malformations incompatible with life, and in cases of rape, incest or unwanted insemination. However, Colombian women still face obstacles to accessing abortion services. This is illustrated by 36 cases of women who in 2006-08 were denied the right to a lawful termination of pregnancy, or had unjustified obstacles put in their path which delayed the termination, which are analysed in this article. We argue that the obstacles resulted from fundamental disagreements about abortion and misunderstandings regarding the ethical, legal and medical requirements arising from the Court's decision. In order to avoid obstacles such as demands for a judge's authorisation, institutional claims of conscientious objection, rejection of a claim of rape, or refusal of health insurance coverage for a legal termination, which constitute discrimination against women, three main strategies are suggested: public ownership of the Court's decision by all Colombian citizens, a professional approach by those involved in the provision of services in line with the law, and monitoring of its implementation by governmental and non-governmental organisations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36531-1DOI Listing

Still can't find the full text of the article?

We can help you send a request to the authors directly.
November 2010
38 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

court's decision
8
obstacles
5
legal medical
4
medical requirements
4
ethical legal
4
misunderstandings ethical
4
abortion misunderstandings
4
requirements arising
4
disagreements abortion
4
arising court's
4
obstacles demands
4
demands judge's
4
judge's authorisation
4
avoid obstacles
4
order avoid
4
fundamental disagreements
4
decision order
4
authorisation institutional
4
obstacles fundamental
4
denied lawful
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Article in Studies in Family Planning
Yam EA et al.
Studies in Family Planning 2006
Article in Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética
Díaz Amado E et al.
Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética 2009
Article in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Boland R et al.
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 1993
Article in Lancet
Ceaser M et al.
Lancet 2006
Article in Lancet
Moloney A et al.
Lancet 2009
Article in Bulletin of Pan American Health Organization
Sanchez Torres F et al.
Bulletin of Pan American Health Organization 1990
Article in International Family Planning Perspectives
Singh S et al.
International Family Planning Perspectives 1991
Article in Cadernos de Saúde Pública
González Vélez A et al.
Cadernos de Saúde Pública 2005

Similar Publications