Targeting antibiotics to households for trachoma control.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2010 Nov 2;4(11):e862. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Background: Mass drug administration (MDA) is part of the current trachoma control strategy, but it can be costly and results in many uninfected individuals receiving treatment. Here we explore whether alternative, targeted approaches are effective antibiotic-sparing strategies.

Methodology/principal Findings: We analysed data on the prevalence of ocular infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and of active trachoma disease among 4,436 individuals from two communities in The Gambia (West Africa) and two communities in Tanzania (East Africa). An age- and household-structured mathematical model of transmission was fitted to these data using maximum likelihood. The presence of active inflammatory disease as a marker of infection in a household was, in general, significantly more sensitive (between 79% [95%CI: 60%-92%] and 86% [71%-95%] across the four communities) than as a marker of infection in an individual (24% [16%-33%]-66% [56%-76%]). Model simulations, under the best fit models for each community, showed that targeting treatment to households has the potential to be as effective as and significantly more cost-effective than mass treatment when antibiotics are not donated. The cost (2007US$) per incident infection averted ranged from 1.5 to 3.1 for MDA, from 1.0 to 1.7 for household-targeted treatment assuming equivalent coverage, and from 0.4 to 1.7 if household visits increased treatment coverage to 100% in selected households. Assuming antibiotics were donated, MDA was predicted to be more cost-effective unless opportunity costs incurred by individuals collecting antibiotics were included or household visits improved treatment uptake. Limiting MDA to children was not as effective in reducing infection as the other aforementioned distribution strategies.

Conclusions/significance: Our model suggests that targeting antibiotics to households with active trachoma has the potential to be a cost-effective trachoma control measure, but further work is required to assess if costs can be reduced and to what extent the approach can increase the treatment coverage of infected individuals compared to MDA in different settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0000862DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2970531PMC
November 2010
10 Reads

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trachoma control
12
marker infection
8
household visits
8
active trachoma
8
antibiotics donated
8
treatment coverage
8
antibiotics households
8
targeting antibiotics
8
treatment
7
mda
5
infection
5
trachoma
5
infection individual
4
79% [95%ci
4
collecting antibiotics
4
individuals collecting
4
individual 24%
4
infection aforementioned
4
sensitive 79%
4
[95%ci 60%-92%]
4

References

(Supplied by CrossRef)
Trachoma control: a guide for programme managers
AW Solomon et al.
2006
Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children.
KD Frick et al.
Bull World Health Organ 2001

Similar Publications