Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a
    Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.
    Cognition 2010 Jul 8;116(1):15-22. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
    Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Italy.
    We investigated whether performing a task with a co-actor shapes the way a subsequent task is performed. In four experiments participants were administered a Simon task after practicing a spatial compatibility task with an incompatible S-R mapping. In Experiment 1 they performed both tasks alongside another person; in Experiment 2 they performed the spatial compatibility task alone, responding to only one stimulus position, and the Simon task with another person; in Experiment 3, they performed the spatial compatibility task with another person and the Simon task alone; finally, in Experiment 4, they performed the spatial compatibility task alone and the Simon task with another person. The incompatible practice eliminated the Simon effect in Experiments 1 and 4. These results indicate that when a task is distributed between two participants with each one performing a different part of it, they tend to represent the whole task rather than their own part of it. This experience can influence the way a subsequent task is performed, as long as this latter occurs in a social context.

    Similar Publications

    Unintentional and intentional learning of noncorresponding stimulus-response associations in the Simon task.
    Acta Psychol (Amst) 2011 Feb 3;136(2):217-24. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
    California State University Long Beach, 90840, USA.
    The Simon effect is a robust phenomenon that persists after extensive practice. However, several studies using a transfer paradigm have shown that the Simon effect is eliminated after practicing a location-relevant task with an incompatible spatial mapping. The present study examined whether this transfer effect is a result of implicit, procedural knowledge developed through repeated execution of noncorresponding responses in the practice session or a consequence of explicitly learning and reinstating a noncorresponding mapping rule. Read More
    Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.
    Mem Cognit 2009 Apr;37(3):358-67
    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
    The Simon effect refers to the observation that responses to a relevant stimulus dimension are faster and more accurate when the stimulus and response spatially correspond than when they do not, even though stimulus position is irrelevant. Recent findings have suggested that the Simon effect can be strongly modulated by prior practice with a spatially incompatible mapping and by correspondence sequence. Although practice is thought to influence conditional stimulus-response (S-R) processing, leaving response priming through the unconditional route unaffected, sequential effects are thought to represent trial-by-trial adaptations that selectively involve unconditional S-R processing. Read More
    Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Am J Psychol 2009 ;122(4):431-53
    University of Padua, Italy.
    We investigated whether learning effects influencing the Simon effect, such as those found when learning involves the spatial stimulus dimension, might be also found when learning tasks involve other nonspatial stimulus features, such as color, shape, and orientation. Experiment 1 focused on mutual influences between Simon tasks based on color and shape. The Simon task on color is affected by a previously performed Simon task on shape more than the latter is affected by a previously performed Simon task on color. Read More