Search our Database of Scientific Publications and Authors

I’m looking for a
    Comparison between a sire model and an animal model for genetic evaluation of fertility traits in Danish Holstein population.
    J Dairy Sci 2009 Aug;92(8):4063-71
    Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark.
    Comparisons between a sire model, a sire-dam model, and an animal model were carried out to evaluate the ability of the models to predict breeding values of fertility traits, based on data including 471,742 records from the first lactation of Danish Holstein cows, covering insemination years from 1995 to 2004. The traits in the analysis were days from calving to first insemination, calving interval, days open, days from first to last insemination, number of inseminations per conception, and nonreturn rate within 56 d after first service. The correlations between sire estimated breeding value (EBV) from the animal model and the sire-dam model were close to 1 for all the traits, and those between the animal model and the sire model ranged from 0.95 to 0.97. Model ability to predict sire breeding value was assessed using 4 criteria: 1) the correlation between sire EBV from 2 data subsets (DATA(A) and DATA(B)); 2) the correlation between sire EBV from training data (DATA(A) or DATA(B)) and yield deviation from test data (DATA(B) or DATA(A)) in a cross-validation procedure; 3) the correlation between the EBV of proven bulls, obtained from the whole data set (DATA(T)) and from a reduced set of data (DATA(C1)) that contained only the first-crop daughters of sires; and 4) the reliability of sire EBV, calculated from the prediction error variance of EBV. All criteria used showed that the animal model was superior to the sire model for all the traits. The sire-dam model performed as well as the animal model and had a slightly smaller computational demand. Averaged over the 6 traits, the correlations between sire EBV from DATA(A) and DATA(B) were 0.61 (sire model) versus 0.64 (animal model), the correlations between EBV from DATA(T) and DATA(C1) for proven bulls were 0.59 versus 0.67, the correlations between EBV and yield deviation in the cross-validation were 0.21 versus 0.24, and the reliabilities of sire EBV were 0.42 versus 0.46. Model ability to predict cow breeding value was measured by the reliability of cow EBV, which increased from 0.21 using the sire model to 0.27 using the animal model. All the results suggest that the animal model, rather than the sire model, should be used for genetic evaluation of fertility traits.

    Similar Publications

    Improvement in genetic evaluation of female fertility in dairy cattle using multiple-trait models including milk production traits.
    J Anim Sci 2010 Mar 4;88(3):871-8. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
    Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
    This study investigated the improvement in genetic evaluation of fertility traits by using production traits as secondary traits (MILK = 305-d milk yield, FAT = 305-d fat yield, and PROT = 305-d protein yield). Data including 471,742 records from first lactations of Denmark Holstein cows, covering the years of inseminations during first lactations from 1995 to 2004, were analyzed. Six fertility traits (i. Read More
    Genetic evaluation of fertility traits of dairy cattle using a multiple-trait animal model.
    J Dairy Sci 2008 Nov;91(11):4333-43
    Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V., Heideweg 1, D-27283 Verden, Germany.
    A genetic evaluation system was developed for 5 fertility traits of dairy cattle: interval from first to successful insemination and nonreturn rate to 56 d of heifers, and interval from calving to first insemination, nonreturn rate to 56 d, and interval first to successful insemination of cows. Using the 2 interval traits of cows as components, breeding values for days open were derived. A multiple-trait animal model was applied to evaluate these fertility traits. Read More
    Calving interval and survival breeding values as measure of cow fertility in a pasture-based production system with seasonal calving.
    J Dairy Sci 2002 Mar;85(3):689-96
    Irish Cattle Breeding Federation, Bandon, Co. Cork.
    In a grass-based production system with seasonal calving, fertility is of major economic importance. A delay in conception due to poor fertility prolongs intercalving interval and causes a shift in calving pattern, which can lead to culling. Calving interval (CIV) information is readily available from milk records; analyzing it, however, presents a problem, as it is only available for cows that conceive and calve again. Read More
    Random regression models for male and female fertility evaluation using longitudinal binary data.
    J Dairy Sci 2006 Sep;89(9):3681-9
    National Agriculture Statistics Service, USDA, Concord, NH 03302-1444, USA.
    A longitudinal Bayesian threshold analysis of insemination outcomes was carried out using 2 random regression models with 3 (Model 1) and 5 (Model 2) parameters to model the additive genetic values at the liability scale. All insemination events of first-parity Holstein cows were used. The outcome of an insemination event was treated as a binary response of either a success (1) or a failure (0). Read More